Loading…

Use of mobile learning module improves skills in chest tube insertion

Abstract Background Just-In-Time Learning is a concept increasingly applied to medical education, and its efficacy must be evaluated. Materials and methods A 3-minute video on chest tube insertion was produced. Consenting participants were assigned to either the video group, which viewed the video o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of surgical research 2012-09, Vol.177 (1), p.21-26
Main Authors: Davis, James S., MD, Garcia, George D., MD, Wyckoff, Mary M., PhD, Alsafran, Salman, MD, Graygo, Jill M., MA, MPH, Withum, Kelly F., BS, Schulman, Carl I., MD, PhD, MSPH
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Just-In-Time Learning is a concept increasingly applied to medical education, and its efficacy must be evaluated. Materials and methods A 3-minute video on chest tube insertion was produced. Consenting participants were assigned to either the video group, which viewed the video on an Apple® iPod Touch immediately before chest tube insertion, or the control group, which received no instruction. Every participant filled out a questionnaire regarding prior chest tube experience. A trained clinician observed participants insert a chest tube on the TraumaMan® task simulator, and assessed performance using a 14-item skills checklist. Results Overall, 128 healthcare trainees participated, with 50% in the video group. Participants included residents (34.4%, n = 44), medical students (32.8%, n = 42), and U.S. Army Forward Surgical Team members (32.8%, n = 42). Sixty-nine percent of all participants responded that they had never placed a chest tube, but 7% had placed more than 20. Only 25% of the participants had previously used TraumaMan®. Subjects who viewed the video scored better on the skills checklist than the control group (11.09 ± 3.09 versus 7.17 ± 3.56, P  
ISSN:0022-4804
1095-8673
DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2012.03.022