Loading…
Historical Causation: Is One Thing more Important than Another?
It is shown that although E. H. Carr's position on the question of the priority of causes is so familiar among historians as to constitute the orthodoxy of the profession, it is beset by a number of problems. It is argued that historians cannot relegate philosophical problems to some separate,...
Saved in:
Published in: | History (London) 1995-06, Vol.80 (259), p.227-242 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | It is shown that although E. H. Carr's position on the question of the priority of causes is so familiar among historians as to constitute the orthodoxy of the profession, it is beset by a number of problems. It is argued that historians cannot relegate philosophical problems to some separate, auxiliary discipline called the "philosophy of history." |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0018-2648 1468-229X |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1468-229X.1995.tb01668.x |