Loading…

Historical Causation: Is One Thing more Important than Another?

It is shown that although E. H. Carr's position on the question of the priority of causes is so familiar among historians as to constitute the orthodoxy of the profession, it is beset by a number of problems. It is argued that historians cannot relegate philosophical problems to some separate,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:History (London) 1995-06, Vol.80 (259), p.227-242
Main Author: RIGBY, S. H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:It is shown that although E. H. Carr's position on the question of the priority of causes is so familiar among historians as to constitute the orthodoxy of the profession, it is beset by a number of problems. It is argued that historians cannot relegate philosophical problems to some separate, auxiliary discipline called the "philosophy of history."
ISSN:0018-2648
1468-229X
DOI:10.1111/j.1468-229X.1995.tb01668.x