Vibration-induced errors in MEMS tuning fork gyroscopes

This paper analyzes potential causes of vibration-induced error in ideal MEMS tuning fork gyroscopes. Even though MEMS gyros are known to be highly susceptible to mechanical vibration, the mechanisms responsible for generating vibration-induced errors are not well understood. We focus on the tuning...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sensors and actuators. A. Physical. 2012-06, Vol.180, p.32-44
Main Authors: Yoon, Sang Won, Lee, Sangwoo, Najafi, Khalil
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Asymmetry
Design engineering
Electrodes
Error detection
Errors
Gyroscope modeling
Gyroscopes
Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS)
Nonlinear capacitance
Tuning fork gyroscopes
Vibration
Vibration sensitivity
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper analyzes potential causes of vibration-induced error in ideal MEMS tuning fork gyroscopes. Even though MEMS gyros are known to be highly susceptible to mechanical vibration, the mechanisms responsible for generating vibration-induced errors are not well understood. We focus on the tuning fork gyroscope (TFG) design that is known to be relatively immune to vibration because of its differential operation and common-mode rejection. Our analysis, however, demonstrates that even an ideal TFG cannot completely eliminate vibrations in special situations because of vibration-induced asymmetry and nonlinearity. We identify three major causes of error that arise from (1) capacitive nonlinearity at the sense electrode, (2) asymmetric electrostatic forces along sense direction at the drive electrodes, and (3) asymmetric electrostatic forces (i.e., drive-electrode capacitance) along drive direction at the drive electrodes. The occurrence conditions and characteristics of each cause are analyzed. The effects of the causes on three classes of TFG gyro designs are analyzed and compared both qualitatively and quantitatively using dynamic analysis and simulation. Interestingly, in our simulation conditions, one TFG design (denoted as Type-DD) is less sensitive to vibration (>99% reduction) than the other two TFG designs (denoted as Type-CP and Type-DS). The reason for this difference is that Type-DD gyroscopes are immune to the dominant cause of error afflicting Type-CP and Type-DS designs. Our analysis also demonstrates that the most critical error-generation condition is vibration along with the sense direction of gyroscopes (denoted as sense-direction vibration) because of its contribution to all causes of error.
ISSN:0924-4247
1873-3069
DOI:10.1016/j.sna.2012.04.022