Loading…

Density functional studies of oxygen-terminations versus hydrogen-terminations in carbon and silicon nanotubes

We performed density functional theory (DFT) calculations to investigate the properties of hydrogen-terminated and oxygen terminated models of representative structures of carbon and silicon nanotubes. Different models based on terminating atoms were constructed for each nanotube; model 1: two-end H...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Solid state sciences 2012-07, Vol.14 (7), p.874-879
Main Authors: Mirzaei, Mahmoud, Yousefi, Mohammad, Meskinfam, Masoumeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We performed density functional theory (DFT) calculations to investigate the properties of hydrogen-terminated and oxygen terminated models of representative structures of carbon and silicon nanotubes. Different models based on terminating atoms were constructed for each nanotube; model 1: two-end H-terminated, model 2: one-end O-terminated and the other end H-terminated, and model 3: two-end O-terminated. The results of obtained parameters including energy gaps, binding energies, dipole moments, bond lengths, and chemical shifts for the optimized models of the investigated nanotubes indicated that the atomic level properties of nanotubes changed more in the O-terminated models than the H-terminated model. Moreover, the O-terminations could change the magnitude of energy gaps and dipole moments. And finally, for investigating the properties of nanotubes, H-terminations models of nanotubes could be more preferred than other types of terminations. [Display omitted] ► H-terminated nanotubes are preferred than O-terminated nanotubes. ► The effects of terminating atoms are significant for the nanotubes. ► The atoms of silicon nanotubes detect more effects of terminating atoms than carbon atoms.
ISSN:1293-2558
1873-3085
DOI:10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2012.04.026