Gender differences in the recognition of spatially transformed figures: Behavioral data and event-related potentials (ERPs)

• Published in: Neuroscience letters 2012-08, Vol.524 (2), p.74-78
• Main Authors: Mikhailova, E.S., Slavutskaya, A.V., Gerasimenko, N.Yu
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Auditory evoked potentials; Data processing; Electroencephalography; ERPs; Event-related potentials; Evoked Potentials, Visual; Female; Form Perception; Gender; Humans; Information processing; Male; Nervous system; Photic Stimulation; Psychomotor Performance; Reaction time task; Recognition (Psychology); Rotation; Sex differences; Sex Factors; Transformation; Visual perception; Visuospatial ability; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0304-3940; 1872-7972
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.07.005

► We examined sex differences in perception of spatially transformed complex visual objects. ► The accuracy and reaction time data showed a similarity of the task performance in males and females. ► Despite to the similarities significant differences between genders in parietal P1 wave were found. ► Only males demonstrated the sensitivity of early perceptual stage to the transformation of objects. The gender differences in accuracy, reaction time (RT) and amplitude of the early P1 and N1 components of ERPs during recognition of previously memorized objects after their spatial transformation were examined. We used three levels of the spatial transformation: a displacement of object details in radial direction, and a displacement in combination with rotation of the details by ±0° to 45° and ±45° to 90°. The accuracy and the RT data showed a similarity of task performance in males and females. The effect of rotation was significantly greater than the effect of simple displacement, and the accuracy decreased, and the RT increased with the rotation angle in both genders. At the same time we found significant sex differences in the early stage of visual processing. In males the P1 peak amplitude at the P3/P4 sites increased significantly during the recognition of spatially transformed objects, and the wider the angle of rotation the greater the P1 peak amplitude. In contrast, in females the P1 peak amplitude did not depend on the rotation of figure details. The N1 amplitude revealed no gender differences, although the object transformation evoked somewhat greater changes in the N1 at the O1/O2 sites in females compared to males. This new fact that only males demonstrated the sensitivity of early perceptual stage to the transformation of objects adds information about the neurobiological basis of different strategies in the visual processing used by each gender.