Euthanasia, assisted suicide and palliative care: a review by the Ethics Committee of the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

• Published in: Annales françaises d'anesthésie et de réanimation 2012-09, Vol.31 (9), p.694-703
• Main Authors: Beydon, L, Pelluchon, C, Beloucif, S, Baghdadi, H, Baumann, A, Bazin, J-E, Bizouarn, P, Crozier, S, Devalois, B, Eon, B, Fieux, F, Frot, C, Gisquet, E, Guibet Lafaye, C, Kentish-Barnes, N, Muzard, O, Nicolas-Robin, A, Lopez, M O, Roussin, F, Puybasset, L
• Format: Article
• Language: fre
• Subjects: Anesthesiology - ethics; Anesthesiology - legislation & jurisprudence; Critical Care - ethics; Ethics Committees; Europe; Euthanasia - ethics; Euthanasia - legislation & jurisprudence; Family; France; Humans; Legislation, Medical; Oregon; Palliative Care - ethics; Palliative Care - legislation & jurisprudence; Physicians; Societies, Medical; Suicide, Assisted - ethics; Suicide, Assisted - legislation & jurisprudence; Terminal Care - ethics
• ISSN: 1769-6623
• DOI: 10.1016/j.annfar.2012.07.019

Management of the end of life is a major social issue which was addressed in France by law, on April 22nd 2005. Nevertheless, a debate has emerged within French society about the legalization of euthanasia and/or assisted suicide (E/AS). This issue raises questions for doctors and most especially for anesthetists and intensive care physicians. To highlight, dispassionately and without dogmatism, key points taken from the published literature and the experience of countries which have legislated for E/AS. The current French law addresses most of the end of life issues an intensive care physician might encounter. It is credited for imposing palliative care when therapies have become senseless and are withdrawn. However, this requirement for palliative care is generally applied too late in the course of a fatal illness. There is a great need for more education and stronger incentives for early action in this area. On the rare occasions when E/AS is requested, either by the patient or their loved-ones, it often results from a failure to consider that treatments have become senseless and conflict with patient's best interest. The implementation of E/AS cannot be reduced to a simple affirmation of the Principle of autonomy. Such procedures present genuine difficulties and the risk of drift. We deliver a message of prudence and caution. Should we address painful end of life and moral suffering issues, by suppressing the subject, i.e. ending the patient's life, when comprehensive palliative care has not first been fully granted to all patients in need of it ?