Loading…
Rivers as Barriers to Primate Distributions in Africa
Rivers border the geographic distributions of primate taxa, but the extent to which the rivers are effective barriers is debated. We here provide the first statistically substantiated analysis of the role of rivers as barriers to the distribution of primates in west and central Africa, as judged by...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of primatology 2012-02, Vol.33 (1), p.168-183 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-5e051903407b3881b7cd727ae30b309a0e7a8018cc95198f88630639d84c1bdf3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-5e051903407b3881b7cd727ae30b309a0e7a8018cc95198f88630639d84c1bdf3 |
container_end_page | 183 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 168 |
container_title | International journal of primatology |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Harcourt, A. H. Wood, M. A. |
description | Rivers border the geographic distributions of primate taxa, but the extent to which the rivers are effective barriers is debated. We here provide the first statistically substantiated analysis of the role of rivers as barriers to the distribution of primates in west and central Africa, as judged by the coincidence of the edge of distributions of forest-dwelling primates with rivers. We use data from the literature to analyze the distributions of 14 genera, 44 species, and 77 subspecies around 18 rivers, river groups, or stretches of rivers. Rivers bordered the distributions of more new taxa (subspecies) than of old taxa (genera), although within genera, age of origin of the taxon did not correlate with likelihood of rivers bordering distributions. Fewer taxa crossed wide rivers than crossed narrow ones. Some analyses indicated that more smaller-bodied genera were stopped by smaller rivers than were larger-bodied genera, but other analyses indicated no effect of body size. Genera with smaller geographic ranges crossed a smaller proportion of the rivers that they met than did genera with large ranges, implying a fundamental difference between small- and large-range taxa in their ability to disperse. Specialization might be the operating trait. Finally, although the aridity of the biogeographic gap in west Africa, the Dahomey Gap, is often argued to be the barrier to movement of species across the Gap, we found that for half the primate species that do not cross the Gap, the rivers that border the Gap could in fact be the effective barrier. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10764-011-9558-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1114285710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2586693511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-5e051903407b3881b7cd727ae30b309a0e7a8018cc95198f88630639d84c1bdf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG_Fk5fqTJM0yXFdP2FBET2HNJtKlt12TVrB_fWmVBAE8TQD87wvzEPIKcIFAojLiCBKlgNirjiX-W6PTJALmssS2D6ZAA7XQuEhOYpxBQBKSDUh_Nl_uBAzE7MrE4If9q7NnoLfmM5l1z52wVd959smZr7JZnXw1hyTg9qsozv5nlPyenvzMr_PF493D_PZIrdM8S7nDjgqoAxERaXEStilKIRxFCoKyoATRgJKa1XiZC1lSaGkaimZxWpZ0yk5H3u3oX3vXez0xkfr1mvTuLaPGhFZIblA-B8FRRmTAjChZ7_QVduHJj2iVYFMpE6WIBwhG9oYg6v1dnASPlOTHpTrUblOyvWgXO9SphgzMbHNmws_xX-HvgD5s4Ej</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>921471424</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rivers as Barriers to Primate Distributions in Africa</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Harcourt, A. H. ; Wood, M. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Harcourt, A. H. ; Wood, M. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Rivers border the geographic distributions of primate taxa, but the extent to which the rivers are effective barriers is debated. We here provide the first statistically substantiated analysis of the role of rivers as barriers to the distribution of primates in west and central Africa, as judged by the coincidence of the edge of distributions of forest-dwelling primates with rivers. We use data from the literature to analyze the distributions of 14 genera, 44 species, and 77 subspecies around 18 rivers, river groups, or stretches of rivers. Rivers bordered the distributions of more new taxa (subspecies) than of old taxa (genera), although within genera, age of origin of the taxon did not correlate with likelihood of rivers bordering distributions. Fewer taxa crossed wide rivers than crossed narrow ones. Some analyses indicated that more smaller-bodied genera were stopped by smaller rivers than were larger-bodied genera, but other analyses indicated no effect of body size. Genera with smaller geographic ranges crossed a smaller proportion of the rivers that they met than did genera with large ranges, implying a fundamental difference between small- and large-range taxa in their ability to disperse. Specialization might be the operating trait. Finally, although the aridity of the biogeographic gap in west Africa, the Dahomey Gap, is often argued to be the barrier to movement of species across the Gap, we found that for half the primate species that do not cross the Gap, the rivers that border the Gap could in fact be the effective barrier.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0164-0291</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8604</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10764-011-9558-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Africa ; Animal Ecology ; Animal Genetics and Genomics ; Animal populations ; Anthropology ; Biogeography ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Body image ; Body size ; Central Africa ; Evolutionary Biology ; Geographic distribution ; Geographical distribution ; Geography ; Human Genetics ; Life Sciences ; Primates ; Primatology ; Rivers ; Statistical analysis ; Taxa ; Taxonomy ; West Africa ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>International journal of primatology, 2012-02, Vol.33 (1), p.168-183</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-5e051903407b3881b7cd727ae30b309a0e7a8018cc95198f88630639d84c1bdf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-5e051903407b3881b7cd727ae30b309a0e7a8018cc95198f88630639d84c1bdf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,27923,27924,33222,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harcourt, A. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, M. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Rivers as Barriers to Primate Distributions in Africa</title><title>International journal of primatology</title><addtitle>Int J Primatol</addtitle><description>Rivers border the geographic distributions of primate taxa, but the extent to which the rivers are effective barriers is debated. We here provide the first statistically substantiated analysis of the role of rivers as barriers to the distribution of primates in west and central Africa, as judged by the coincidence of the edge of distributions of forest-dwelling primates with rivers. We use data from the literature to analyze the distributions of 14 genera, 44 species, and 77 subspecies around 18 rivers, river groups, or stretches of rivers. Rivers bordered the distributions of more new taxa (subspecies) than of old taxa (genera), although within genera, age of origin of the taxon did not correlate with likelihood of rivers bordering distributions. Fewer taxa crossed wide rivers than crossed narrow ones. Some analyses indicated that more smaller-bodied genera were stopped by smaller rivers than were larger-bodied genera, but other analyses indicated no effect of body size. Genera with smaller geographic ranges crossed a smaller proportion of the rivers that they met than did genera with large ranges, implying a fundamental difference between small- and large-range taxa in their ability to disperse. Specialization might be the operating trait. Finally, although the aridity of the biogeographic gap in west Africa, the Dahomey Gap, is often argued to be the barrier to movement of species across the Gap, we found that for half the primate species that do not cross the Gap, the rivers that border the Gap could in fact be the effective barrier.</description><subject>Africa</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body image</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Central Africa</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Geographic distribution</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>Primatology</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>West Africa</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0164-0291</issn><issn>1573-8604</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG_Fk5fqTJM0yXFdP2FBET2HNJtKlt12TVrB_fWmVBAE8TQD87wvzEPIKcIFAojLiCBKlgNirjiX-W6PTJALmssS2D6ZAA7XQuEhOYpxBQBKSDUh_Nl_uBAzE7MrE4If9q7NnoLfmM5l1z52wVd959smZr7JZnXw1hyTg9qsozv5nlPyenvzMr_PF493D_PZIrdM8S7nDjgqoAxERaXEStilKIRxFCoKyoATRgJKa1XiZC1lSaGkaimZxWpZ0yk5H3u3oX3vXez0xkfr1mvTuLaPGhFZIblA-B8FRRmTAjChZ7_QVduHJj2iVYFMpE6WIBwhG9oYg6v1dnASPlOTHpTrUblOyvWgXO9SphgzMbHNmws_xX-HvgD5s4Ej</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Harcourt, A. H.</creator><creator>Wood, M. A.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Rivers as Barriers to Primate Distributions in Africa</title><author>Harcourt, A. H. ; Wood, M. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-5e051903407b3881b7cd727ae30b309a0e7a8018cc95198f88630639d84c1bdf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Africa</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Animal Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body image</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Central Africa</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Geographic distribution</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>Primatology</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>West Africa</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harcourt, A. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, M. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of primatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harcourt, A. H.</au><au>Wood, M. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rivers as Barriers to Primate Distributions in Africa</atitle><jtitle>International journal of primatology</jtitle><stitle>Int J Primatol</stitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>168</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>168-183</pages><issn>0164-0291</issn><eissn>1573-8604</eissn><abstract>Rivers border the geographic distributions of primate taxa, but the extent to which the rivers are effective barriers is debated. We here provide the first statistically substantiated analysis of the role of rivers as barriers to the distribution of primates in west and central Africa, as judged by the coincidence of the edge of distributions of forest-dwelling primates with rivers. We use data from the literature to analyze the distributions of 14 genera, 44 species, and 77 subspecies around 18 rivers, river groups, or stretches of rivers. Rivers bordered the distributions of more new taxa (subspecies) than of old taxa (genera), although within genera, age of origin of the taxon did not correlate with likelihood of rivers bordering distributions. Fewer taxa crossed wide rivers than crossed narrow ones. Some analyses indicated that more smaller-bodied genera were stopped by smaller rivers than were larger-bodied genera, but other analyses indicated no effect of body size. Genera with smaller geographic ranges crossed a smaller proportion of the rivers that they met than did genera with large ranges, implying a fundamental difference between small- and large-range taxa in their ability to disperse. Specialization might be the operating trait. Finally, although the aridity of the biogeographic gap in west Africa, the Dahomey Gap, is often argued to be the barrier to movement of species across the Gap, we found that for half the primate species that do not cross the Gap, the rivers that border the Gap could in fact be the effective barrier.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10764-011-9558-z</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0164-0291 |
ispartof | International journal of primatology, 2012-02, Vol.33 (1), p.168-183 |
issn | 0164-0291 1573-8604 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1114285710 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Springer Link |
subjects | Africa Animal Ecology Animal Genetics and Genomics Animal populations Anthropology Biogeography Biomedical and Life Sciences Body image Body size Central Africa Evolutionary Biology Geographic distribution Geographical distribution Geography Human Genetics Life Sciences Primates Primatology Rivers Statistical analysis Taxa Taxonomy West Africa Zoology |
title | Rivers as Barriers to Primate Distributions in Africa |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A30%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rivers%20as%20Barriers%20to%20Primate%20Distributions%20in%20Africa&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20primatology&rft.au=Harcourt,%20A.%20H.&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=168&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=168-183&rft.issn=0164-0291&rft.eissn=1573-8604&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10764-011-9558-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2586693511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-5e051903407b3881b7cd727ae30b309a0e7a8018cc95198f88630639d84c1bdf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=921471424&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |