Loading…

Rivers as Barriers to Primate Distributions in Africa

Rivers border the geographic distributions of primate taxa, but the extent to which the rivers are effective barriers is debated. We here provide the first statistically substantiated analysis of the role of rivers as barriers to the distribution of primates in west and central Africa, as judged by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of primatology 2012-02, Vol.33 (1), p.168-183
Main Authors: Harcourt, A. H., Wood, M. A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-5e051903407b3881b7cd727ae30b309a0e7a8018cc95198f88630639d84c1bdf3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-5e051903407b3881b7cd727ae30b309a0e7a8018cc95198f88630639d84c1bdf3
container_end_page 183
container_issue 1
container_start_page 168
container_title International journal of primatology
container_volume 33
creator Harcourt, A. H.
Wood, M. A.
description Rivers border the geographic distributions of primate taxa, but the extent to which the rivers are effective barriers is debated. We here provide the first statistically substantiated analysis of the role of rivers as barriers to the distribution of primates in west and central Africa, as judged by the coincidence of the edge of distributions of forest-dwelling primates with rivers. We use data from the literature to analyze the distributions of 14 genera, 44 species, and 77 subspecies around 18 rivers, river groups, or stretches of rivers. Rivers bordered the distributions of more new taxa (subspecies) than of old taxa (genera), although within genera, age of origin of the taxon did not correlate with likelihood of rivers bordering distributions. Fewer taxa crossed wide rivers than crossed narrow ones. Some analyses indicated that more smaller-bodied genera were stopped by smaller rivers than were larger-bodied genera, but other analyses indicated no effect of body size. Genera with smaller geographic ranges crossed a smaller proportion of the rivers that they met than did genera with large ranges, implying a fundamental difference between small- and large-range taxa in their ability to disperse. Specialization might be the operating trait. Finally, although the aridity of the biogeographic gap in west Africa, the Dahomey Gap, is often argued to be the barrier to movement of species across the Gap, we found that for half the primate species that do not cross the Gap, the rivers that border the Gap could in fact be the effective barrier.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10764-011-9558-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1114285710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2586693511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-5e051903407b3881b7cd727ae30b309a0e7a8018cc95198f88630639d84c1bdf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG_Fk5fqTJM0yXFdP2FBET2HNJtKlt12TVrB_fWmVBAE8TQD87wvzEPIKcIFAojLiCBKlgNirjiX-W6PTJALmssS2D6ZAA7XQuEhOYpxBQBKSDUh_Nl_uBAzE7MrE4If9q7NnoLfmM5l1z52wVd959smZr7JZnXw1hyTg9qsozv5nlPyenvzMr_PF493D_PZIrdM8S7nDjgqoAxERaXEStilKIRxFCoKyoATRgJKa1XiZC1lSaGkaimZxWpZ0yk5H3u3oX3vXez0xkfr1mvTuLaPGhFZIblA-B8FRRmTAjChZ7_QVduHJj2iVYFMpE6WIBwhG9oYg6v1dnASPlOTHpTrUblOyvWgXO9SphgzMbHNmws_xX-HvgD5s4Ej</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>921471424</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rivers as Barriers to Primate Distributions in Africa</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Harcourt, A. H. ; Wood, M. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Harcourt, A. H. ; Wood, M. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Rivers border the geographic distributions of primate taxa, but the extent to which the rivers are effective barriers is debated. We here provide the first statistically substantiated analysis of the role of rivers as barriers to the distribution of primates in west and central Africa, as judged by the coincidence of the edge of distributions of forest-dwelling primates with rivers. We use data from the literature to analyze the distributions of 14 genera, 44 species, and 77 subspecies around 18 rivers, river groups, or stretches of rivers. Rivers bordered the distributions of more new taxa (subspecies) than of old taxa (genera), although within genera, age of origin of the taxon did not correlate with likelihood of rivers bordering distributions. Fewer taxa crossed wide rivers than crossed narrow ones. Some analyses indicated that more smaller-bodied genera were stopped by smaller rivers than were larger-bodied genera, but other analyses indicated no effect of body size. Genera with smaller geographic ranges crossed a smaller proportion of the rivers that they met than did genera with large ranges, implying a fundamental difference between small- and large-range taxa in their ability to disperse. Specialization might be the operating trait. Finally, although the aridity of the biogeographic gap in west Africa, the Dahomey Gap, is often argued to be the barrier to movement of species across the Gap, we found that for half the primate species that do not cross the Gap, the rivers that border the Gap could in fact be the effective barrier.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0164-0291</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8604</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10764-011-9558-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Africa ; Animal Ecology ; Animal Genetics and Genomics ; Animal populations ; Anthropology ; Biogeography ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Body image ; Body size ; Central Africa ; Evolutionary Biology ; Geographic distribution ; Geographical distribution ; Geography ; Human Genetics ; Life Sciences ; Primates ; Primatology ; Rivers ; Statistical analysis ; Taxa ; Taxonomy ; West Africa ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>International journal of primatology, 2012-02, Vol.33 (1), p.168-183</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-5e051903407b3881b7cd727ae30b309a0e7a8018cc95198f88630639d84c1bdf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-5e051903407b3881b7cd727ae30b309a0e7a8018cc95198f88630639d84c1bdf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,27923,27924,33222,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harcourt, A. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, M. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Rivers as Barriers to Primate Distributions in Africa</title><title>International journal of primatology</title><addtitle>Int J Primatol</addtitle><description>Rivers border the geographic distributions of primate taxa, but the extent to which the rivers are effective barriers is debated. We here provide the first statistically substantiated analysis of the role of rivers as barriers to the distribution of primates in west and central Africa, as judged by the coincidence of the edge of distributions of forest-dwelling primates with rivers. We use data from the literature to analyze the distributions of 14 genera, 44 species, and 77 subspecies around 18 rivers, river groups, or stretches of rivers. Rivers bordered the distributions of more new taxa (subspecies) than of old taxa (genera), although within genera, age of origin of the taxon did not correlate with likelihood of rivers bordering distributions. Fewer taxa crossed wide rivers than crossed narrow ones. Some analyses indicated that more smaller-bodied genera were stopped by smaller rivers than were larger-bodied genera, but other analyses indicated no effect of body size. Genera with smaller geographic ranges crossed a smaller proportion of the rivers that they met than did genera with large ranges, implying a fundamental difference between small- and large-range taxa in their ability to disperse. Specialization might be the operating trait. Finally, although the aridity of the biogeographic gap in west Africa, the Dahomey Gap, is often argued to be the barrier to movement of species across the Gap, we found that for half the primate species that do not cross the Gap, the rivers that border the Gap could in fact be the effective barrier.</description><subject>Africa</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body image</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Central Africa</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Geographic distribution</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>Primatology</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>West Africa</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0164-0291</issn><issn>1573-8604</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG_Fk5fqTJM0yXFdP2FBET2HNJtKlt12TVrB_fWmVBAE8TQD87wvzEPIKcIFAojLiCBKlgNirjiX-W6PTJALmssS2D6ZAA7XQuEhOYpxBQBKSDUh_Nl_uBAzE7MrE4If9q7NnoLfmM5l1z52wVd959smZr7JZnXw1hyTg9qsozv5nlPyenvzMr_PF493D_PZIrdM8S7nDjgqoAxERaXEStilKIRxFCoKyoATRgJKa1XiZC1lSaGkaimZxWpZ0yk5H3u3oX3vXez0xkfr1mvTuLaPGhFZIblA-B8FRRmTAjChZ7_QVduHJj2iVYFMpE6WIBwhG9oYg6v1dnASPlOTHpTrUblOyvWgXO9SphgzMbHNmws_xX-HvgD5s4Ej</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Harcourt, A. H.</creator><creator>Wood, M. A.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Rivers as Barriers to Primate Distributions in Africa</title><author>Harcourt, A. H. ; Wood, M. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-5e051903407b3881b7cd727ae30b309a0e7a8018cc95198f88630639d84c1bdf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Africa</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Animal Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body image</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Central Africa</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Geographic distribution</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>Primatology</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>West Africa</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harcourt, A. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, M. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of primatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harcourt, A. H.</au><au>Wood, M. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rivers as Barriers to Primate Distributions in Africa</atitle><jtitle>International journal of primatology</jtitle><stitle>Int J Primatol</stitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>168</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>168-183</pages><issn>0164-0291</issn><eissn>1573-8604</eissn><abstract>Rivers border the geographic distributions of primate taxa, but the extent to which the rivers are effective barriers is debated. We here provide the first statistically substantiated analysis of the role of rivers as barriers to the distribution of primates in west and central Africa, as judged by the coincidence of the edge of distributions of forest-dwelling primates with rivers. We use data from the literature to analyze the distributions of 14 genera, 44 species, and 77 subspecies around 18 rivers, river groups, or stretches of rivers. Rivers bordered the distributions of more new taxa (subspecies) than of old taxa (genera), although within genera, age of origin of the taxon did not correlate with likelihood of rivers bordering distributions. Fewer taxa crossed wide rivers than crossed narrow ones. Some analyses indicated that more smaller-bodied genera were stopped by smaller rivers than were larger-bodied genera, but other analyses indicated no effect of body size. Genera with smaller geographic ranges crossed a smaller proportion of the rivers that they met than did genera with large ranges, implying a fundamental difference between small- and large-range taxa in their ability to disperse. Specialization might be the operating trait. Finally, although the aridity of the biogeographic gap in west Africa, the Dahomey Gap, is often argued to be the barrier to movement of species across the Gap, we found that for half the primate species that do not cross the Gap, the rivers that border the Gap could in fact be the effective barrier.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10764-011-9558-z</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0164-0291
ispartof International journal of primatology, 2012-02, Vol.33 (1), p.168-183
issn 0164-0291
1573-8604
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1114285710
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Springer Link
subjects Africa
Animal Ecology
Animal Genetics and Genomics
Animal populations
Anthropology
Biogeography
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Body image
Body size
Central Africa
Evolutionary Biology
Geographic distribution
Geographical distribution
Geography
Human Genetics
Life Sciences
Primates
Primatology
Rivers
Statistical analysis
Taxa
Taxonomy
West Africa
Zoology
title Rivers as Barriers to Primate Distributions in Africa
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A30%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rivers%20as%20Barriers%20to%20Primate%20Distributions%20in%20Africa&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20primatology&rft.au=Harcourt,%20A.%20H.&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=168&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=168-183&rft.issn=0164-0291&rft.eissn=1573-8604&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10764-011-9558-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2586693511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-5e051903407b3881b7cd727ae30b309a0e7a8018cc95198f88630639d84c1bdf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=921471424&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true