Loading…

Evaluation of Incomplete Sentinel Node Biopsy Procedures and Sentinel Node Positivity Rates as Surgical Quality-Assurance Parameters in Melanoma Patients

Background There is little literature describing quality assurance (QA) validation of an individual surgeon’s ability to perform sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in melanoma patients. This study aims to evaluate incomplete SNB rates and SNB positivity rates as potential QA parameters. Methods An instituti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of surgical oncology 2012-11, Vol.19 (12), p.3919-3925
Main Authors: Spillane, Andrew J., Haydu, Lauren E., Lee, Nicholas C., Uren, Roger F., Stretch, Jonathan R., Shannon, Kerwin F., Quinn, Michael J., Saw, Robyn P. M., McCarthy, William H., Thompson, John F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background There is little literature describing quality assurance (QA) validation of an individual surgeon’s ability to perform sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in melanoma patients. This study aims to evaluate incomplete SNB rates and SNB positivity rates as potential QA parameters. Methods An institutional database identified 2,874 patients with primary melanoma who had SNB performed when there was lymphoscintigraphy drainage to a single lymphatic field. Lymphoscintigraphy data were obtained from another database. Lymphoscintigraphy utilized small-particle colloid, allowing visualization of channels entering sentinel nodes on early dynamic scanning. Incomplete SNB was defined as retrieval of fewer sentinel nodes than identified on lymphoscintigraphy. Results The overall rate of incomplete SNB was 17.7 % (including axilla 7.8 %, neck 23.3 %, and groin 28.8 %). Individual surgeons varied significantly in their proportion of SNBs performed in each region ( p  
ISSN:1068-9265
1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-012-2427-y