Simulation of the effects of different pilot helmets on neck loading during air combat

• Published in: Journal of biomechanics 2012-09, Vol.45 (14), p.2362-2367
• Main Authors: Mathys, R, Ferguson, S.J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aircraft; Biological and medical sciences; Cervical Vertebrae - physiology; Computer Simulation; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Head Protective Devices; Head–neck model; Helmet weights; Helmets; Humans; Joint reaction load; Kinematics; Models, Biological; Muscle activation; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology; Neck pain; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; Pilots; Skull - physiology; Static optimization; Vertebrae; Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports; Weight-Bearing
• ISSN: 0021-9290; 1873-2380
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.07.014

Abstract New generation pilot helmets with mounted devices enhance the capabilities of pilots substantially. However, the additional equipment increases the helmet weight and shifts its center of mass forward. Two helmets with different mass properties were modeled to simulate their effects on the pilot's neck. A musculoskeletal computer model was used, with the methods of inverse dynamics and static optimization, to compute the muscle activations and joint reaction forces for a given range of quasi-static postures at various accelerations experienced during air combat. Head postures which induce much higher loads on the cervical spine than encountered in a neutral position could be identified. The increased weight and the forward shift of the center of mass of a new generation helmet lead to higher muscle activations and higher joint reaction loads over a wide range of head and neck movements. The muscle activations required to balance the head and neck in extreme postures increased the compressive force at the T1–C7 level substantially, while in a neutral posture the muscle activations remained low. The lateral neck muscles can reach activations of 100% and cause compressive joint forces up to 1100 N during extensive rotations and extensions at high ‘vertical’ accelerations (Gz). The calculated values have to be interpreted with care as the model has not been validated. Nevertheless, this systematic analysis could separate the effects of head posture, acceleration and helmet mass on neck loading. More reliable data about mass properties and muscle morphometry with a more detailed motion analysis would help to refine the existing model.