Loading…

Property Concepts, Ecological Thought, and Ecosystem Management: A Case of Conservation Policymaking in Vermont

Ecosystem management focuses on dynamic processes that cross boundaries. The consequent need to work across boundaries clashes with notions of property. Beginning in 1996, the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources reformulated its land acquisition policy to incorporate newly articulated ecological goa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Society & natural resources 2002-04, Vol.15 (4), p.295-312
Main Authors: Hurley, Janet M., Ginger, Clare, Capen, David E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-36eee2965099c57870a48b0702c994f781b5794bafe6e91e20dd6bb6ea1245573
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-36eee2965099c57870a48b0702c994f781b5794bafe6e91e20dd6bb6ea1245573
container_end_page 312
container_issue 4
container_start_page 295
container_title Society & natural resources
container_volume 15
creator Hurley, Janet M.
Ginger, Clare
Capen, David E.
description Ecosystem management focuses on dynamic processes that cross boundaries. The consequent need to work across boundaries clashes with notions of property. Beginning in 1996, the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources reformulated its land acquisition policy to incorporate newly articulated ecological goals that parallel those of ecosystem management. The process triggered a debate about property rights and the role of the state in promoting ecological goals through land acquisition. We examined ecological and property concepts drawn on during the process, changes in the planning process, and implications for ecosystem management. Using the idea of property as divisible bundles of rights, the state advocated conservation easements, which split ownership among parties, and promoted the concept of a working landscape to accommodate resource-based livelihoods. Our analysis illustrates the importance of examining interactions among concepts, social relations, and physical space to understand relationships between ecological principles and property rights issues in regional environmental planning.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/089419202753570792
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1171849087</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1171849087</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-36eee2965099c57870a48b0702c994f781b5794bafe6e91e20dd6bb6ea1245573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkbFuFDEURS0EEkvgB6hcAUUmPNvjsY1EEa0CQQoiRaC1PN43G8OMvdheYP6eHS1dpKV60tU59xWXkJcMLhhoeAvatMxw4EoKqUAZ_oismOSsAcXFY7JagGYhnpJnpXwHAKFbviLpNqcd5jrTdYoed7Wc0yufxrQN3o307j7tt_f1nLq4WfIyl4oT_eyi2-KEsb6jl3TtCtI0LA0F8y9XQ4r0No3Bz5P7EeKWhki_YZ5SrM_Jk8GNBV_8u2fk64eru_V1c_Pl46f15U3jhTS1ER0ictNJMMZLpRW4VveggHtj2kFp1ktl2t4N2KFhyGGz6fq-Q8d4K6USZ-T1sXeX0889lmqnUDyOo4uY9sUqaQTjmsGBfHWSZG3HGJfdAXxzGmSK6daAXr7zI-pzKiXjYHc5TC7PloFdBrMPBztI749SiEPKk_ud8rix1c1jykN20YdixUlf_9d_qNn6p4q_nbWtmA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1171849087</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Property Concepts, Ecological Thought, and Ecosystem Management: A Case of Conservation Policymaking in Vermont</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Hurley, Janet M. ; Ginger, Clare ; Capen, David E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hurley, Janet M. ; Ginger, Clare ; Capen, David E.</creatorcontrib><description>Ecosystem management focuses on dynamic processes that cross boundaries. The consequent need to work across boundaries clashes with notions of property. Beginning in 1996, the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources reformulated its land acquisition policy to incorporate newly articulated ecological goals that parallel those of ecosystem management. The process triggered a debate about property rights and the role of the state in promoting ecological goals through land acquisition. We examined ecological and property concepts drawn on during the process, changes in the planning process, and implications for ecosystem management. Using the idea of property as divisible bundles of rights, the state advocated conservation easements, which split ownership among parties, and promoted the concept of a working landscape to accommodate resource-based livelihoods. Our analysis illustrates the importance of examining interactions among concepts, social relations, and physical space to understand relationships between ecological principles and property rights issues in regional environmental planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-1920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-0723</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/089419202753570792</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Conservation Policy ; Ecosystem Management ; Ecosystems ; Environmental Planning ; Natural Resource Conservation ; Natural resources ; Property Rights ; Social relations ; U.S.A ; Vermont ; Working Landscape</subject><ispartof>Society &amp; natural resources, 2002-04, Vol.15 (4), p.295-312</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-36eee2965099c57870a48b0702c994f781b5794bafe6e91e20dd6bb6ea1245573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-36eee2965099c57870a48b0702c994f781b5794bafe6e91e20dd6bb6ea1245573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33201</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hurley, Janet M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginger, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capen, David E.</creatorcontrib><title>Property Concepts, Ecological Thought, and Ecosystem Management: A Case of Conservation Policymaking in Vermont</title><title>Society &amp; natural resources</title><description>Ecosystem management focuses on dynamic processes that cross boundaries. The consequent need to work across boundaries clashes with notions of property. Beginning in 1996, the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources reformulated its land acquisition policy to incorporate newly articulated ecological goals that parallel those of ecosystem management. The process triggered a debate about property rights and the role of the state in promoting ecological goals through land acquisition. We examined ecological and property concepts drawn on during the process, changes in the planning process, and implications for ecosystem management. Using the idea of property as divisible bundles of rights, the state advocated conservation easements, which split ownership among parties, and promoted the concept of a working landscape to accommodate resource-based livelihoods. Our analysis illustrates the importance of examining interactions among concepts, social relations, and physical space to understand relationships between ecological principles and property rights issues in regional environmental planning.</description><subject>Conservation Policy</subject><subject>Ecosystem Management</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental Planning</subject><subject>Natural Resource Conservation</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Property Rights</subject><subject>Social relations</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Vermont</subject><subject>Working Landscape</subject><issn>0894-1920</issn><issn>1521-0723</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkbFuFDEURS0EEkvgB6hcAUUmPNvjsY1EEa0CQQoiRaC1PN43G8OMvdheYP6eHS1dpKV60tU59xWXkJcMLhhoeAvatMxw4EoKqUAZ_oismOSsAcXFY7JagGYhnpJnpXwHAKFbviLpNqcd5jrTdYoed7Wc0yufxrQN3o307j7tt_f1nLq4WfIyl4oT_eyi2-KEsb6jl3TtCtI0LA0F8y9XQ4r0No3Bz5P7EeKWhki_YZ5SrM_Jk8GNBV_8u2fk64eru_V1c_Pl46f15U3jhTS1ER0ictNJMMZLpRW4VveggHtj2kFp1ktl2t4N2KFhyGGz6fq-Q8d4K6USZ-T1sXeX0889lmqnUDyOo4uY9sUqaQTjmsGBfHWSZG3HGJfdAXxzGmSK6daAXr7zI-pzKiXjYHc5TC7PloFdBrMPBztI749SiEPKk_ud8rix1c1jykN20YdixUlf_9d_qNn6p4q_nbWtmA</recordid><startdate>20020401</startdate><enddate>20020401</enddate><creator>Hurley, Janet M.</creator><creator>Ginger, Clare</creator><creator>Capen, David E.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020401</creationdate><title>Property Concepts, Ecological Thought, and Ecosystem Management: A Case of Conservation Policymaking in Vermont</title><author>Hurley, Janet M. ; Ginger, Clare ; Capen, David E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-36eee2965099c57870a48b0702c994f781b5794bafe6e91e20dd6bb6ea1245573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Conservation Policy</topic><topic>Ecosystem Management</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental Planning</topic><topic>Natural Resource Conservation</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Property Rights</topic><topic>Social relations</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Vermont</topic><topic>Working Landscape</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hurley, Janet M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginger, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capen, David E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Society &amp; natural resources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hurley, Janet M.</au><au>Ginger, Clare</au><au>Capen, David E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Property Concepts, Ecological Thought, and Ecosystem Management: A Case of Conservation Policymaking in Vermont</atitle><jtitle>Society &amp; natural resources</jtitle><date>2002-04-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>295</spage><epage>312</epage><pages>295-312</pages><issn>0894-1920</issn><eissn>1521-0723</eissn><abstract>Ecosystem management focuses on dynamic processes that cross boundaries. The consequent need to work across boundaries clashes with notions of property. Beginning in 1996, the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources reformulated its land acquisition policy to incorporate newly articulated ecological goals that parallel those of ecosystem management. The process triggered a debate about property rights and the role of the state in promoting ecological goals through land acquisition. We examined ecological and property concepts drawn on during the process, changes in the planning process, and implications for ecosystem management. Using the idea of property as divisible bundles of rights, the state advocated conservation easements, which split ownership among parties, and promoted the concept of a working landscape to accommodate resource-based livelihoods. Our analysis illustrates the importance of examining interactions among concepts, social relations, and physical space to understand relationships between ecological principles and property rights issues in regional environmental planning.</abstract><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/089419202753570792</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-1920
ispartof Society & natural resources, 2002-04, Vol.15 (4), p.295-312
issn 0894-1920
1521-0723
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1171849087
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects Conservation Policy
Ecosystem Management
Ecosystems
Environmental Planning
Natural Resource Conservation
Natural resources
Property Rights
Social relations
U.S.A
Vermont
Working Landscape
title Property Concepts, Ecological Thought, and Ecosystem Management: A Case of Conservation Policymaking in Vermont
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T20%3A08%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Property%20Concepts,%20Ecological%20Thought,%20and%20Ecosystem%20Management:%20A%20Case%20of%20Conservation%20Policymaking%20in%20Vermont&rft.jtitle=Society%20&%20natural%20resources&rft.au=Hurley,%20Janet%20M.&rft.date=2002-04-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=295&rft.epage=312&rft.pages=295-312&rft.issn=0894-1920&rft.eissn=1521-0723&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/089419202753570792&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1171849087%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-36eee2965099c57870a48b0702c994f781b5794bafe6e91e20dd6bb6ea1245573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1171849087&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true