Loading…
Property Concepts, Ecological Thought, and Ecosystem Management: A Case of Conservation Policymaking in Vermont
Ecosystem management focuses on dynamic processes that cross boundaries. The consequent need to work across boundaries clashes with notions of property. Beginning in 1996, the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources reformulated its land acquisition policy to incorporate newly articulated ecological goa...
Saved in:
Published in: | Society & natural resources 2002-04, Vol.15 (4), p.295-312 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-36eee2965099c57870a48b0702c994f781b5794bafe6e91e20dd6bb6ea1245573 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-36eee2965099c57870a48b0702c994f781b5794bafe6e91e20dd6bb6ea1245573 |
container_end_page | 312 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 295 |
container_title | Society & natural resources |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Hurley, Janet M. Ginger, Clare Capen, David E. |
description | Ecosystem management focuses on dynamic processes that cross boundaries. The consequent need to work across boundaries clashes with notions of property. Beginning in 1996, the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources reformulated its land acquisition policy to incorporate newly articulated ecological goals that parallel those of ecosystem management. The process triggered a debate about property rights and the role of the state in promoting ecological goals through land acquisition. We examined ecological and property concepts drawn on during the process, changes in the planning process, and implications for ecosystem management. Using the idea of property as divisible bundles of rights, the state advocated conservation easements, which split ownership among parties, and promoted the concept of a working landscape to accommodate resource-based livelihoods. Our analysis illustrates the importance of examining interactions among concepts, social relations, and physical space to understand relationships between ecological principles and property rights issues in regional environmental planning. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/089419202753570792 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1171849087</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1171849087</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-36eee2965099c57870a48b0702c994f781b5794bafe6e91e20dd6bb6ea1245573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkbFuFDEURS0EEkvgB6hcAUUmPNvjsY1EEa0CQQoiRaC1PN43G8OMvdheYP6eHS1dpKV60tU59xWXkJcMLhhoeAvatMxw4EoKqUAZ_oismOSsAcXFY7JagGYhnpJnpXwHAKFbviLpNqcd5jrTdYoed7Wc0yufxrQN3o307j7tt_f1nLq4WfIyl4oT_eyi2-KEsb6jl3TtCtI0LA0F8y9XQ4r0No3Bz5P7EeKWhki_YZ5SrM_Jk8GNBV_8u2fk64eru_V1c_Pl46f15U3jhTS1ER0ictNJMMZLpRW4VveggHtj2kFp1ktl2t4N2KFhyGGz6fq-Q8d4K6USZ-T1sXeX0889lmqnUDyOo4uY9sUqaQTjmsGBfHWSZG3HGJfdAXxzGmSK6daAXr7zI-pzKiXjYHc5TC7PloFdBrMPBztI749SiEPKk_ud8rix1c1jykN20YdixUlf_9d_qNn6p4q_nbWtmA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1171849087</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Property Concepts, Ecological Thought, and Ecosystem Management: A Case of Conservation Policymaking in Vermont</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Hurley, Janet M. ; Ginger, Clare ; Capen, David E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hurley, Janet M. ; Ginger, Clare ; Capen, David E.</creatorcontrib><description>Ecosystem management focuses on dynamic processes that cross boundaries. The consequent need to work across boundaries clashes with notions of property. Beginning in 1996, the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources reformulated its land acquisition policy to incorporate newly articulated ecological goals that parallel those of ecosystem management. The process triggered a debate about property rights and the role of the state in promoting ecological goals through land acquisition. We examined ecological and property concepts drawn on during the process, changes in the planning process, and implications for ecosystem management. Using the idea of property as divisible bundles of rights, the state advocated conservation easements, which split ownership among parties, and promoted the concept of a working landscape to accommodate resource-based livelihoods. Our analysis illustrates the importance of examining interactions among concepts, social relations, and physical space to understand relationships between ecological principles and property rights issues in regional environmental planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-1920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-0723</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/089419202753570792</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Conservation Policy ; Ecosystem Management ; Ecosystems ; Environmental Planning ; Natural Resource Conservation ; Natural resources ; Property Rights ; Social relations ; U.S.A ; Vermont ; Working Landscape</subject><ispartof>Society & natural resources, 2002-04, Vol.15 (4), p.295-312</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-36eee2965099c57870a48b0702c994f781b5794bafe6e91e20dd6bb6ea1245573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-36eee2965099c57870a48b0702c994f781b5794bafe6e91e20dd6bb6ea1245573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33201</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hurley, Janet M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginger, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capen, David E.</creatorcontrib><title>Property Concepts, Ecological Thought, and Ecosystem Management: A Case of Conservation Policymaking in Vermont</title><title>Society & natural resources</title><description>Ecosystem management focuses on dynamic processes that cross boundaries. The consequent need to work across boundaries clashes with notions of property. Beginning in 1996, the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources reformulated its land acquisition policy to incorporate newly articulated ecological goals that parallel those of ecosystem management. The process triggered a debate about property rights and the role of the state in promoting ecological goals through land acquisition. We examined ecological and property concepts drawn on during the process, changes in the planning process, and implications for ecosystem management. Using the idea of property as divisible bundles of rights, the state advocated conservation easements, which split ownership among parties, and promoted the concept of a working landscape to accommodate resource-based livelihoods. Our analysis illustrates the importance of examining interactions among concepts, social relations, and physical space to understand relationships between ecological principles and property rights issues in regional environmental planning.</description><subject>Conservation Policy</subject><subject>Ecosystem Management</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental Planning</subject><subject>Natural Resource Conservation</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Property Rights</subject><subject>Social relations</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Vermont</subject><subject>Working Landscape</subject><issn>0894-1920</issn><issn>1521-0723</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkbFuFDEURS0EEkvgB6hcAUUmPNvjsY1EEa0CQQoiRaC1PN43G8OMvdheYP6eHS1dpKV60tU59xWXkJcMLhhoeAvatMxw4EoKqUAZ_oismOSsAcXFY7JagGYhnpJnpXwHAKFbviLpNqcd5jrTdYoed7Wc0yufxrQN3o307j7tt_f1nLq4WfIyl4oT_eyi2-KEsb6jl3TtCtI0LA0F8y9XQ4r0No3Bz5P7EeKWhki_YZ5SrM_Jk8GNBV_8u2fk64eru_V1c_Pl46f15U3jhTS1ER0ictNJMMZLpRW4VveggHtj2kFp1ktl2t4N2KFhyGGz6fq-Q8d4K6USZ-T1sXeX0889lmqnUDyOo4uY9sUqaQTjmsGBfHWSZG3HGJfdAXxzGmSK6daAXr7zI-pzKiXjYHc5TC7PloFdBrMPBztI749SiEPKk_ud8rix1c1jykN20YdixUlf_9d_qNn6p4q_nbWtmA</recordid><startdate>20020401</startdate><enddate>20020401</enddate><creator>Hurley, Janet M.</creator><creator>Ginger, Clare</creator><creator>Capen, David E.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020401</creationdate><title>Property Concepts, Ecological Thought, and Ecosystem Management: A Case of Conservation Policymaking in Vermont</title><author>Hurley, Janet M. ; Ginger, Clare ; Capen, David E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-36eee2965099c57870a48b0702c994f781b5794bafe6e91e20dd6bb6ea1245573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Conservation Policy</topic><topic>Ecosystem Management</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental Planning</topic><topic>Natural Resource Conservation</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Property Rights</topic><topic>Social relations</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Vermont</topic><topic>Working Landscape</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hurley, Janet M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginger, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capen, David E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Society & natural resources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hurley, Janet M.</au><au>Ginger, Clare</au><au>Capen, David E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Property Concepts, Ecological Thought, and Ecosystem Management: A Case of Conservation Policymaking in Vermont</atitle><jtitle>Society & natural resources</jtitle><date>2002-04-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>295</spage><epage>312</epage><pages>295-312</pages><issn>0894-1920</issn><eissn>1521-0723</eissn><abstract>Ecosystem management focuses on dynamic processes that cross boundaries. The consequent need to work across boundaries clashes with notions of property. Beginning in 1996, the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources reformulated its land acquisition policy to incorporate newly articulated ecological goals that parallel those of ecosystem management. The process triggered a debate about property rights and the role of the state in promoting ecological goals through land acquisition. We examined ecological and property concepts drawn on during the process, changes in the planning process, and implications for ecosystem management. Using the idea of property as divisible bundles of rights, the state advocated conservation easements, which split ownership among parties, and promoted the concept of a working landscape to accommodate resource-based livelihoods. Our analysis illustrates the importance of examining interactions among concepts, social relations, and physical space to understand relationships between ecological principles and property rights issues in regional environmental planning.</abstract><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/089419202753570792</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0894-1920 |
ispartof | Society & natural resources, 2002-04, Vol.15 (4), p.295-312 |
issn | 0894-1920 1521-0723 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1171849087 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection |
subjects | Conservation Policy Ecosystem Management Ecosystems Environmental Planning Natural Resource Conservation Natural resources Property Rights Social relations U.S.A Vermont Working Landscape |
title | Property Concepts, Ecological Thought, and Ecosystem Management: A Case of Conservation Policymaking in Vermont |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T20%3A08%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Property%20Concepts,%20Ecological%20Thought,%20and%20Ecosystem%20Management:%20A%20Case%20of%20Conservation%20Policymaking%20in%20Vermont&rft.jtitle=Society%20&%20natural%20resources&rft.au=Hurley,%20Janet%20M.&rft.date=2002-04-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=295&rft.epage=312&rft.pages=295-312&rft.issn=0894-1920&rft.eissn=1521-0723&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/089419202753570792&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1171849087%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-36eee2965099c57870a48b0702c994f781b5794bafe6e91e20dd6bb6ea1245573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1171849087&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |