Loading…

Current UK management of locally recurrent rectal cancer

Aim  The study aimed to determine current UK practice in the management of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). Method  An electronic based survey was sent to UK based Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland members to establish current management in this patient group. A total...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Colorectal disease 2012-12, Vol.14 (12), p.1479-1482
Main Authors: Harji, D. P., Griffiths, B., McArthur, D. R., Sagar, P. M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim  The study aimed to determine current UK practice in the management of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). Method  An electronic based survey was sent to UK based Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland members to establish current management in this patient group. A total of 188 questionnaires were sent out to consultant surgeons in a total of 105 colorectal units. Results  Seventy‐nine consultants from 69 units responded, giving an overall response rate from consultants of 42% and from colorectal units of 66%. In all, 688 patients were managed by multidisciplinary teams in the 12 months prior to the survey. Seventy‐four (94% of responders) surgeons had experience of operating on patients with LRRC. Fifty‐nine (74.6%) operated on one to three per year and four (5%) operated on more than 10 patients per year. Central and anterior recurrences were most commonly undertaken locally, with most complex recurrences being referred to a tertiary centre. Forty‐seven (61%) surgeons worked to an algorithm. Conclusion  A small number of specialist units in the UK manage the full spectrum of LRRC but the majority of patients are managed in small volume centres. The survey provides a snapshot of current activity in the UK and may provide a stimulus for discussion about how to expand and improve the care of a technically challenging group of patients.
ISSN:1462-8910
1463-1318
DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03070.x