Seeking Depth in Science

Michael Strevens develops kairetic account of causal explanations as a brand of explanatory reductionism. He argues that explanations in higher-level sciences are complete (stand-alone) only because they can be potentially deepened—that is, added kernels of causal processes all the way down to the l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2012-12, Vol.42 (4), p.561-572
Main Author: Perovic, Slobodan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Causal explanation
Causality
Metaphysics
Philosophy of science
Physical environment
Reductionism
Science history
Social philosophy
Social sciences
Strevens, Michael
Theory
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Michael Strevens develops kairetic account of causal explanations as a brand of explanatory reductionism. He argues that explanations in higher-level sciences are complete (stand-alone) only because they can be potentially deepened—that is, added kernels of causal processes all the way down to the level of micro-physical relations. Thus, they are, in essence, the result of abstraction from deeper causal explanatory levels. I argue that Strevens’s discussion of the notion of depth in science is limited to a very narrow domain, the boundaries of which are determined by a simplistic amalgam of science textbook and everyday cases analyzed by means of rational metaphysics. In contrast to his view, history of scientific practice shows that scientific explanations are typically bounded within a level and do not draw their viability from their potential for lower-level explanatory deepening. Moreover, a result of such deepening of higher-level explanations produces changes and refinements much more complex than Strevens’s account assumes.
ISSN:0048-3931
1552-7441
DOI:10.1177/0048393110386707