Loading…

Coping and its effects on cancer caregiving

Purpose Various studies have documented the emotional distress family members of persons with cancer experience, and descriptive research has identified those psychosocial factors that protect cancer caregivers from a range of negative outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine how diffe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Supportive care in cancer 2013-02, Vol.21 (2), p.385-395
Main Authors: Gaugler, Joseph E., Eppinger, Alejandra, King, Jamie, Sandberg, Tracey, Regine, William F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose Various studies have documented the emotional distress family members of persons with cancer experience, and descriptive research has identified those psychosocial factors that protect cancer caregivers from a range of negative outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine how different coping strategies were associated with multiple domains of stress and negative health outcomes among cancer family caregivers. Methods A cross-sectional, correlational study design was used. One hundred forty-eight family caregivers of persons with cancer from the University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center and the University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center were included. Results Multiple regression models found that negative expectation coping strategies (worrying, expecting the worst, and getting nervous) and cancer caregivers’ perceptions of not coping well were most significantly associated with emotional distress and negative psychological outcomes. Conclusion Coping strategies, and in particular negative coping styles, have a consistent and exacerbating influence on various stressors and negative psychological outcomes for cancer caregivers. Given their pervasive effects across multiple stress process domains, the alleviation or redirection of negative expectation coping strategies may enhance the delivery of clinical interventions to result in stronger, long-lasting benefits.
ISSN:0941-4355
1433-7339
DOI:10.1007/s00520-012-1525-5