Loading…

Epicardial fat, abdominal adiposity and insulin resistance in obese pre-pubertal and early pubertal children

Abstract Objective To assess the cross-sectional association of epicardial fat with insulin resistance, major abdominal adipose depots, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in obese pre-pubertal and early pubertal children. Methods By using magnetic resonance imaging in 30 pre-pubertal and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atherosclerosis 2013-02, Vol.226 (2), p.490-495
Main Authors: Manco, Melania, Morandi, Anita, Marigliano, Marco, Rigotti, Francesca, Manfredi, Riccardo, Maffeis, Claudio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective To assess the cross-sectional association of epicardial fat with insulin resistance, major abdominal adipose depots, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in obese pre-pubertal and early pubertal children. Methods By using magnetic resonance imaging in 30 pre-pubertal and early pubertal patients [21 males, Tanner Stage I-II, median age 11.2 (2.95) y, BMI z -score 2.56 ± 0.11 SDS], visceral (VAT), subcutaneous (SAT), epicardial adipose tissues (EAT) and hepatic fat fraction (HFF) were estimated. Lipid profile, liver function tests, circulating adipokines and markers of inflammation [leptin, adiponectin, tumor necrosis factors-alpha (TNF-alpha), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukins 6 and 10 (IL-6, IL-10)] were assayed. Insulin resistance was estimated by the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Body composition was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results In 14 insulin resistant children (HOMA-IR >2.5), median values of EAT were significantly higher than in insulin sensitive mates [54.0 (35.45) cm3 vs. 27.2 (17.03) cm3 ; p  = 0.03]. Moreover, EAT performed no differently in identifying insulin resistant patients (AUC 0.737; 95% CI 0.538–0.936; p  = 0.028) from VAT (AUC 0.772; 95% CI 0.599–0.945; p  = 0.011); SAT (AUC 0.795; 95% CI 0.628–0.0.962; p  = 0.006); and HFF (AUC 0.777; 95% CI 0.607–0.947; p  = 0.010). Stepwise regression analysis showed that EAT ( β  = 0.025; 95% CI 0.012–0.038, p  = 0.001) and CRP ( β  = 0.622; 95% CI 0.069–0.238, p  = 0.002) predicted HOMA-IR ( R2  = 0.71; p  = 0.001), while VAT, SAT and HFF were excluded from the model. Conclusions In pre-pubertal and early pubertal obese children, EAT is a significant marker of increased insulin resistance and associated cardiovascular risk.
ISSN:0021-9150
1879-1484
DOI:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.11.023