Nonstandard, Not Substandard: The Relationship Among Work Arrangements, Work Attitudes, and Job Performance

The authors investigate how nonstandard work arrangements shape work attitudes and behaviors. They find that attitudes and behaviors vary across different types of nonstandard work arrangements. As expected, retention part-time workers have more positive and agency temporary workers more negative at...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Work and occupations 2008-02, Vol.35 (1), p.3-43
Main Authors: Broschak, Joseph P., Davis-Blake, Alison, Block, Emily S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Employment
General studies
Management
Occupation
Positioning
Sociology
Sociology of work
Sociology of work and sociology of organizations
Supervisors
Temporary works
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The authors investigate how nonstandard work arrangements shape work attitudes and behaviors. They find that attitudes and behaviors vary across different types of nonstandard work arrangements. As expected, retention part-time workers have more positive and agency temporary workers more negative attitudes toward their work arrangements than do standard workers. But contrary to conventional wisdom about temporary work arrangements, agency temporary workers who have opportunities to transition to standard employment arrangements have more positive attitudes toward supervisors and coworkers and are better performers than their peers in standard work arrangements. Part-time arrangements designed to retain valued workers do not produce increased commitment or other attitudinal benefits consistent with retention. The authors discuss the implications of the findings for the study of nonstandard work and the management of nonstandard workers.
ISSN:0730-8884
1552-8464
DOI:10.1177/0730888407309604