Loading…
Pre- and post-surgical factors that predict the provision of rescue analgesia following hysterectomy
Background To better manage post‐surgical pain, standardized analgesic protocols allow for rescue analgesia (RA). This study seeks to determine which pre‐ and post‐surgical clinical and patient‐related factors, in addition to post‐surgical pain, may influence health care professional decisions on RA...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of pain 2013-03, Vol.17 (3), p.423-433 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
To better manage post‐surgical pain, standardized analgesic protocols allow for rescue analgesia (RA). This study seeks to determine which pre‐ and post‐surgical clinical and patient‐related factors, in addition to post‐surgical pain, may influence health care professional decisions on RA administration.
Methods
A consecutive sample of 185 women, submitted to hysterectomy for benign disorders, was assessed 24 h before (time 1; T1) and 48 h after (time 2; T2) surgery. At T1, baseline demographic, clinical and psychological predictors were assessed and at T2, post‐surgical pain, anxiety and RA administration were recorded.
Results
After controlling for post‐surgical acute pain intensity, logistic regression results revealed several pre‐surgical (T1) and surgical factors associated with post‐surgical RA: having other previous pain states [odds ratio (OR), 4.551; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.642–12.611, p = 0.004], being anaesthetized with only general or loco‐regional anaesthesia (OR, 5.349; 95% CI, 1.976–14.483, p = 0.001) and pre‐surgical fear of immediate consequences of surgery (OR, 1.306; 95% CI, 1.031–1.655, p = 0.027). Concerning post‐surgical variables, higher pain intensity (OR, 1.591; 95% CI, 1.353–1.871, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1090-3801 1532-2149 |
DOI: | 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00205.x |