Loading…

A Randomised Comparative Study Evaluating Learning Curves of Novices in a Basic Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery Task

Objective There is currently no objective quantification of the temporal changes in performance associated with a novice surgeon learning single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) operative tasks. Analysing learning curves allows us to objectively quantify performance. The aim was to evaluate if t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2013-03, Vol.17 (3), p.569-575
Main Authors: Sodergren, Mikael, McGregor, Colleen, Farne, Hugo A., Cao, Jiguo, Lv, Zhijun, Purkayastha, Sanjay, Athanasiou, Thanos, Darzi, Ara, Paraskeva, Paraskevas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective There is currently no objective quantification of the temporal changes in performance associated with a novice surgeon learning single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) operative tasks. Analysing learning curves allows us to objectively quantify performance. The aim was to evaluate if the rate of learning and ultimate proficiency level reached in SILS when using straight or articulating instruments is different to conventional laparoscopy and if training in laparoscopy influences learning or proficiency for SILS. Design and Setting Thirty-six surgically naive medical students were randomised to complete the validated peg transfer task over 50 repetitions using a conventional laparoscopic set-up, SILS set-up with straight instruments or articulated instruments or SILS set-up after having reached proficiency using a conventional laparoscopy. Results There was a significant increased overall proficiency between the group trained in conventional laparoscopy and all other groups ( p  
ISSN:1091-255X
1873-4626
DOI:10.1007/s11605-012-2113-1