Loading…

Methods for Extracting Heavy Metals in Soils from the Southwestern Amazon, Brazil

Heavy metals occur naturally in soil, at concentrations that depend on the parent material from which the soil was formed, the processes of formation, and the composition and the proportion of the components of its solid phase. Quantifying these concentrations is important for environmental studies...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water, air, and soil pollution air, and soil pollution, 2013-02, Vol.224 (2), p.1-16, Article 1430
Main Authors: dos Santos, Sabrina Novaes, Alleoni, Luís Reynaldo Ferracciú
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Heavy metals occur naturally in soil, at concentrations that depend on the parent material from which the soil was formed, the processes of formation, and the composition and the proportion of the components of its solid phase. Quantifying these concentrations is important for environmental studies of soil contamination and pollution, and choosing the methods for doing so is a key step in establishing heavy metal contents in soil samples. We evaluated two digestion methods (aqua regia and EPA 3051, both microwave oven-assisted) for assessing pseudo-total concentrations of Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in the surface layer (0–20 cm) of soil samples from the Brazilian agricultural frontier in the southwestern Amazon. Nineteen composite samples of the most representative soil classes for the states of Mato Grosso and Rondônia were collected under native vegetation undisturbed by human intervention. Canonical discriminant analysis and principal component analysis were used for multivariate exploration of the data. Aqua regia extracted higher amounts of Co, Ni, Pb, and Zn than EPA 3051, while levels of Cr and Cu did not differ between methods. In general, aqua regia recovered more of the metals when compared to reference soil samples.
ISSN:0049-6979
1573-2932
DOI:10.1007/s11270-012-1430-z