Loading…

Concomitant use of enteral nutrition therapy is associated with sustained response to infliximab in patients with Crohn’s disease

Background/Objectives: A significant proportion of Crohn’s disease (CD) patients receiving infliximab (IFX) maintenance therapy show loss of responsiveness despite a good initial response. The factors other than immunomodulators that prevent IFX dose escalation have yet to be fully elucidated. This...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of clinical nutrition 2012-11, Vol.66 (11), p.1219-1223
Main Authors: Sazuka, S, Katsuno, T, Nakagawa, T, Saito, M, Saito, K, Matsumura, T, Arai, M, Sato, T, Yokosuka, O
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background/Objectives: A significant proportion of Crohn’s disease (CD) patients receiving infliximab (IFX) maintenance therapy show loss of responsiveness despite a good initial response. The factors other than immunomodulators that prevent IFX dose escalation have yet to be fully elucidated. This study was performed to identify clinical factors or concomitant therapies associated with sustained response to IFX. Subjects/Methods: Seventy-four consecutive CD patients who had successful IFX induction therapy between 2002 and 2010 underwent IFX maintenance therapy. Patients showing loss of response to IFX were treated with IFX intensification therapy. Factors involved in the sustained response to IFX were investigated retrospectively. Results: After a median follow-up of 85 weeks, loss of response to IFX was observed in 30 (40.5%) cases. On logistic regression analysis, concomitant use of enteral nutrition (EN) therapy (elemental and/or polymeric formulas) was identified as an independent factor associated with sustained response to IFX. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated a cutoff value of 600 kcal/day. We divided the patients into the ‘EN group’ (⩾600 kcal/day) and ‘control group’ (
ISSN:0954-3007
1476-5640
DOI:10.1038/ejcn.2012.120