Loading…

Safety and immunogenicity of pneumococcal protein vaccine candidates: Monovalent choline-binding protein A (PcpA) vaccine and bivalent PcpAapneumococcal histidine triad protein D vaccine

Background: Pneumococcal vaccines based on protein antigens may provide expanded protection against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Objective: To evaluate safety and immunogenicity in adults of pneumococcal vaccine candidates comprising S. pneumoniae pneumococcal histidine triad protein D (PhtD) and pneum...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Vaccine 2012-12, Vol.30 (52), p.7461-7468
Main Authors: Bologa, Monica, Kamtchoua, Thierry, Hopfer, Robert, Sheng, Xiaohua, Hicks, Bryony, Bixler, Garvin, Hou, Victor, Pehlic, Vildana, Yuan, Tao, Gurunathan, Sanjay
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Pneumococcal vaccines based on protein antigens may provide expanded protection against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Objective: To evaluate safety and immunogenicity in adults of pneumococcal vaccine candidates comprising S. pneumoniae pneumococcal histidine triad protein D (PhtD) and pneumococcal choline-binding protein A (PcpA) in monovalent and bivalent formulations. Methods: This was a phase I, randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled, step-wise dose-escalation study. Following a pilot safety study in which participants received one intramuscular injection of either aluminum hydroxide (AH)aadjuvanted PcpA (25 mu g) or PhtDaPcpA (10 mu g each), participants in the main study received AHaadjuvanted PcpA (25 mu g), AHaadjuvanted PhtDaPcpA (10, 25, or 50 mu g each), unadjuvanted PhtDaPcpA (25 mu g each), or placebo as 2 injections 30 days apart. Assignment of successive dose cohorts was made after blinded safety reviews after each dose level. Safety endpoints included rates of solicited injection site and systemic reactions, unsolicited adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and safety laboratory tests. Immunogenicity endpoints included levels of anti-PhtD and anti-PcpA antibodies (ELISA). Results: Six adults 18a50 years of age were included in the pilot study and 125 in the main study. No obvious increases in solicited reactions or unsolicited AEs were reported with escalating doses (adjuvanted vaccine) after either injection, or with repeated administration. Adjuvanted vaccine candidates were associated with a higher incidence of solicited reactions (particularly injection site reactions) than unadjuvanted vaccine candidates. However, no SAE or discontinuation due to an AE occurred. Geometric mean concentrations of anti-PhtD IgG and anti-PcpA IgG increased significantly after injection 2 compared with injection 1 at each dose level. No enhancement of immune responses was shown with adjuvanted vaccine candidates compared with the unadjuvanted vaccine candidate. In the dose-escalating comparison, a plateau effect at the 25 mu g dose was observed as measured by geometric mean concentrations and by fold increases. Conclusions: Promising safety profiles and immunogenicity of these monovalent and bivalent protein vaccine candidates were demonstrated in an adult population (ClinicalTrials.gov registry no. NCT01444339).
ISSN:0264-410X