Loading…

Objective evaluation of cervical spine mobility after surgery during free-living activity

Abstract Background Evaluation of cervical spine mobility after surgery is mainly based on the measurement of the range of motion during imposed movements. It can thus be questionable if this assessment represents the mobility experienced during daily life. The goal of this study was to propose a ne...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical biomechanics (Bristol) 2013-04, Vol.28 (4), p.364-369
Main Authors: Duc, C, Salvia, P, Lubansu, A, Feipel, V, Aminian, K
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Evaluation of cervical spine mobility after surgery is mainly based on the measurement of the range of motion during imposed movements. It can thus be questionable if this assessment represents the mobility experienced during daily life. The goal of this study was to propose a new evaluation tool based on the monitoring of cervical spine movement during daily activities. Methods The detection of cervical movement and the determination of primary motion component (lateral bending, axial rotation or flexion–extension), using two inertial sensors, were first validated in laboratory settings. Fifteen patients who underwent a cervical arthrodesis and nine healthy control subjects were monitored during their daily activity for half a day. The frequency of cervical movement was quantified according to posture, i.e. static and walking periods. The amplitude and velocity of cervical movement were evaluated using the median and cumulative distribution function. Findings The movement detection and classification showed an excellent performance (sensitivity and specificity > 94%). For the daily monitoring, the patients presented a movement frequency similar to controls, whereas the amplitude and velocity in patients were lower than in controls ( P < 0.05). The differences between patients and controls were larger for the velocity parameters (effect sizes > 0.37 and > 0.54 for static and walking periods respectively) than for the amplitude parameters. Interpretation Body-worn inertial sensors enable the quantitative evaluation of global cervical movement. The movement amplitude and velocity during free-living conditions can be used as objective parameters to evaluate the cervical spine mobility after treatment.
ISSN:0268-0033
1879-1271
DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.03.006