Loading…

Effect of pH and ligand charge state on BACE-1 fragment docking performance

In this work we propose a protocol for estimating the effect of pH on the docking performance to BACE-1, which affords the charge state of the inhibitor as well as the protonation state of all ionisable residues in the protein at a given pH value. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first repo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of computer-aided molecular design 2013-05, Vol.27 (5), p.403-417
Main Authors: Domínguez, José L., Villaverde, M. Carmen, Sussman, Fredy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this work we propose a protocol for estimating the effect of pH on the docking performance to BACE-1, which affords the charge state of the inhibitor as well as the protonation state of all ionisable residues in the protein at a given pH value. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a protocol predicting the BACE-1 ligand docking poses not only at the neutral pH at which most crystallographic structures were obtained, but also at the optimal pH of the enzyme (in the acidic range), at which most of the BACE-1 binding affinity assays are performed. We have applied this protocol to a set of 23 fragment-like BACE-1 ligands that span four orders of magnitude in their binding affinities. The p K a values of the BACE-1 acidic residues deviate substantially from the estimates for model compounds in solution and display a ligand dependent variability, especially in the case of the catalytic Asp dyad residues. This outcome should have a strong bearing on the design of protocols for docking based BACE-1 screening campaigns. Finally, we were able to find an explanation for the poor docking success rate of some fragments based on the availability of anchoring points, a rationale that could help to improve hit rates in BACE-1 screening campaigns.
ISSN:0920-654X
1573-4951
DOI:10.1007/s10822-013-9653-7