Loading…

Across the great divide: Boundaries and boundary objects in art and science

This paper explores collaboration between artists and scientists through participant observation. Four artist/scientist pairs worked together to create ten-minute performances for a festival held in January, 2009 in Ithaca, New York. Each pair created their piece over the course of three two-hour me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public understanding of science (Bristol, England) England), 2012-11, Vol.21 (8), p.922-937
Main Author: Halpern, Megan K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-abef2952c4927a12b7acefeddbb6432bb17499777732abb3d99536afa96e41ef3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-abef2952c4927a12b7acefeddbb6432bb17499777732abb3d99536afa96e41ef3
container_end_page 937
container_issue 8
container_start_page 922
container_title Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)
container_volume 21
creator Halpern, Megan K.
description This paper explores collaboration between artists and scientists through participant observation. Four artist/scientist pairs worked together to create ten-minute performances for a festival held in January, 2009 in Ithaca, New York. Each pair created their piece over the course of three two-hour meetings, the first of which employed a cultural probe to open a discourse between the artist and scientist and to facilitate collaboration. My role as a participant observer allowed me to closely observe collaborative processes in which pairs engaged in boundary work and made use of boundary objects. The boundary work helped the pairs establish authority and autonomy within their respective sub-fields, while at the same time provoking discussions that led to the creation of their projects. The pairs used three types of boundary objects: existing, created, and appropriated. These established a common language by which they could create and present their performances to an audience.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0963662510394040
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1399057623</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0963662510394040</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1399057623</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-abef2952c4927a12b7acefeddbb6432bb17499777732abb3d99536afa96e41ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMotlb3riTgxs1oXpMYd7X4woIbXQ953KlT2pmazAj-e9NOFSmYTQjnO-feHIROKbmkVKkroiWXkuWUcC2IIHtoSLmkmZRE76PhWs7W-gAdxTgnhHDB5CEaMH7NmRL5ED2PXWhixO074FkA02JffVYebvBt09XehAoiNrXHtn9-4cbOwbURVzU2od1o0VVQOzhGB6VZRDjZ3iP0dn_3OnnMpi8PT5PxNHOC0zYzFkqmc-aEZspQZpVxUIL31krBmbVUCa1VOpwZa7nXOufSlEZLEBRKPkIXfe4qNB8dxLZYVtHBYmFqaLpYUK41yZVkPKHnO-i86UKdtisoZUIQpplMFOmpTRcBymIVqmX6bEFJsS662C06Wc62wZ1dgv81_DSbgKwHopnBn6n_BX4DN2eD4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1124402926</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Across the great divide: Boundaries and boundary objects in art and science</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Halpern, Megan K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Halpern, Megan K.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper explores collaboration between artists and scientists through participant observation. Four artist/scientist pairs worked together to create ten-minute performances for a festival held in January, 2009 in Ithaca, New York. Each pair created their piece over the course of three two-hour meetings, the first of which employed a cultural probe to open a discourse between the artist and scientist and to facilitate collaboration. My role as a participant observer allowed me to closely observe collaborative processes in which pairs engaged in boundary work and made use of boundary objects. The boundary work helped the pairs establish authority and autonomy within their respective sub-fields, while at the same time provoking discussions that led to the creation of their projects. The pairs used three types of boundary objects: existing, created, and appropriated. These established a common language by which they could create and present their performances to an audience.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-6625</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6609</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0963662510394040</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23832745</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Artists ; Collaboration ; Culture ; Discourse analysis ; Performance art</subject><ispartof>Public understanding of science (Bristol, England), 2012-11, Vol.21 (8), p.922-937</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2011</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Nov 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-abef2952c4927a12b7acefeddbb6432bb17499777732abb3d99536afa96e41ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-abef2952c4927a12b7acefeddbb6432bb17499777732abb3d99536afa96e41ef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27845,27903,27904,79110</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23832745$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halpern, Megan K.</creatorcontrib><title>Across the great divide: Boundaries and boundary objects in art and science</title><title>Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)</title><addtitle>Public Underst Sci</addtitle><description>This paper explores collaboration between artists and scientists through participant observation. Four artist/scientist pairs worked together to create ten-minute performances for a festival held in January, 2009 in Ithaca, New York. Each pair created their piece over the course of three two-hour meetings, the first of which employed a cultural probe to open a discourse between the artist and scientist and to facilitate collaboration. My role as a participant observer allowed me to closely observe collaborative processes in which pairs engaged in boundary work and made use of boundary objects. The boundary work helped the pairs establish authority and autonomy within their respective sub-fields, while at the same time provoking discussions that led to the creation of their projects. The pairs used three types of boundary objects: existing, created, and appropriated. These established a common language by which they could create and present their performances to an audience.</description><subject>Artists</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Performance art</subject><issn>0963-6625</issn><issn>1361-6609</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMotlb3riTgxs1oXpMYd7X4woIbXQ953KlT2pmazAj-e9NOFSmYTQjnO-feHIROKbmkVKkroiWXkuWUcC2IIHtoSLmkmZRE76PhWs7W-gAdxTgnhHDB5CEaMH7NmRL5ED2PXWhixO074FkA02JffVYebvBt09XehAoiNrXHtn9-4cbOwbURVzU2od1o0VVQOzhGB6VZRDjZ3iP0dn_3OnnMpi8PT5PxNHOC0zYzFkqmc-aEZspQZpVxUIL31krBmbVUCa1VOpwZa7nXOufSlEZLEBRKPkIXfe4qNB8dxLZYVtHBYmFqaLpYUK41yZVkPKHnO-i86UKdtisoZUIQpplMFOmpTRcBymIVqmX6bEFJsS662C06Wc62wZ1dgv81_DSbgKwHopnBn6n_BX4DN2eD4g</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Halpern, Megan K.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>Across the great divide: Boundaries and boundary objects in art and science</title><author>Halpern, Megan K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-abef2952c4927a12b7acefeddbb6432bb17499777732abb3d99536afa96e41ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Artists</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Performance art</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halpern, Megan K.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halpern, Megan K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Across the great divide: Boundaries and boundary objects in art and science</atitle><jtitle>Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Public Underst Sci</addtitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>922</spage><epage>937</epage><pages>922-937</pages><issn>0963-6625</issn><eissn>1361-6609</eissn><abstract>This paper explores collaboration between artists and scientists through participant observation. Four artist/scientist pairs worked together to create ten-minute performances for a festival held in January, 2009 in Ithaca, New York. Each pair created their piece over the course of three two-hour meetings, the first of which employed a cultural probe to open a discourse between the artist and scientist and to facilitate collaboration. My role as a participant observer allowed me to closely observe collaborative processes in which pairs engaged in boundary work and made use of boundary objects. The boundary work helped the pairs establish authority and autonomy within their respective sub-fields, while at the same time provoking discussions that led to the creation of their projects. The pairs used three types of boundary objects: existing, created, and appropriated. These established a common language by which they could create and present their performances to an audience.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>23832745</pmid><doi>10.1177/0963662510394040</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0963-6625
ispartof Public understanding of science (Bristol, England), 2012-11, Vol.21 (8), p.922-937
issn 0963-6625
1361-6609
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1399057623
source PAIS Index; SAGE
subjects Artists
Collaboration
Culture
Discourse analysis
Performance art
title Across the great divide: Boundaries and boundary objects in art and science
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T11%3A02%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Across%20the%20great%20divide:%20Boundaries%20and%20boundary%20objects%20in%20art%20and%20science&rft.jtitle=Public%20understanding%20of%20science%20(Bristol,%20England)&rft.au=Halpern,%20Megan%20K.&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=922&rft.epage=937&rft.pages=922-937&rft.issn=0963-6625&rft.eissn=1361-6609&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0963662510394040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1399057623%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-abef2952c4927a12b7acefeddbb6432bb17499777732abb3d99536afa96e41ef3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1124402926&rft_id=info:pmid/23832745&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0963662510394040&rfr_iscdi=true