Loading…

Residual sleepiness in sleep apnea patients treated by continuous positive airway pressure

Summary Hypoxic brain damage might explain persistent sleepiness in some continuous positive airway pressure‐compliant obstructive sleep apnea called residual excessive sleepiness. Although continuous positive airway pressure may not be fully efficient in treating this symptom, wake‐promoting drug p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of sleep research 2013-08, Vol.22 (4), p.389-397
Main Authors: Gasa, Merce, Tamisier, Renaud, Launois, Sandrine H., Sapene, Marc, Martin, Francis, Stach, Bruno, Grillet, Yves, Levy, Patrick, Pepin, Jean‐Louis
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Hypoxic brain damage might explain persistent sleepiness in some continuous positive airway pressure‐compliant obstructive sleep apnea called residual excessive sleepiness. Although continuous positive airway pressure may not be fully efficient in treating this symptom, wake‐promoting drug prescription in residual excessive sleepiness is no longer allowed by the European Medicines Agency. The aim of this study is to describe residual excessive sleepiness phenotypes in a large prospective sample of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Residual excessive sleepiness was defined by an Epworth Sleepiness Scale score ≥ 11. Eligible patients from the French National Sleep Registry attending follow‐up continuous positive airway pressure visits numbered 1047. Patients using continuous positive airway pressure  15 h−1 (n = 31) or with major depression were excluded (n = 150). Residual excessive sleepiness prevalence in continuous positive airway pressure‐treated obstructive sleep apnea was 13% (18% for those with an initial Epworth Sleepiness Scale score > 11), and significantly decreased with continuous positive airway pressure use (9% in ≥ 6 h night−1 continuous positive airway pressure users, P  30 h−1 versus 18% when AHI 15–30, P 
ISSN:0962-1105
1365-2869
DOI:10.1111/jsr.12039