The utility of prostate‐specific antigen in the management of advanced prostate cancer

• Published in: BJU international 2013-09, Vol.112 (5), p.548-560
• Main Authors: Crawford, E. David, Bennett, Charles L., Andriole, Gerald L., Garnick, Marc B., Petrylak, Daniel P.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: advanced prostate cancer; Androgen Antagonists - therapeutic use; Androgens; androgen‐deprivation therapy; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use; Biological and medical sciences; Biomarkers; Biomarkers, Tumor - blood; Combined Modality Therapy; Disease Progression; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics; Humans; Male; Male genital diseases; Medical sciences; Neoplasm Staging; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases; Orchiectomy - methods; patient management; Predictive Value of Tests; Prostate cancer; Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood; prostate‐specific antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms - blood; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology; Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy; Regulatory approval; Tumors; Tumors of the urinary system; Urinary tract. Prostate gland
• ISSN: 1464-4096; 1464-410X
• DOI: 10.1111/bju.12061

To review current prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) metrics used in monitoring treatment of advanced prostate cancer, with a specific focus on castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) therapies. Explore what is known about the correlation between PSA and androgen levels as well as underlying reasons for persistent PSA expression and serum elevation in CRPC, and outline suggestions for use of PSA in managing patients with advanced prostate cancer. A comprehensive search of the PubMed database for English language articles through April 2012 was performed using the following Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) keywords or terms, alone or in combination: ‘prostate cancer’; ‘prostate cancer treatment’; ‘prostate cancer outcomes’; ‘prostate‐specific antigen’; ‘androgen receptor’; ‘advanced prostate cancer’; ‘castration‐resistant prostate cancer’; ‘biomarkers’. Bibliographies of relevant articles were searched for additional references. Relevant medical society and regulatory agency web sites from the USA and Europe were accessed for issued guidance on PSA use. PSA doubling time (PSADT) is a useful metric for determining which patients should be considered for androgen‐deprivation therapy (ADT) after failing local treatment or for second‐line therapies after failing ADT. However, it is not a validated surrogate for survival and no therapy has received regulatory approval based upon PSADT characteristics. PSA nadir and time‐to‐nadir have been identified as possible prognostic markers for patients receiving ADT. There is no universally accepted definition for PSA progression, nor is PSA progression a regulatory‐approved surrogate for clinical progression in drug approval trials. PSA responses to second‐line therapies can vary and are not considered by regulatory agencies as valid surrogates for clinical endpoints, so they must be assessed in the context of each individual therapy and trial design. PSA expression in CRPC is often a reflection of persistent androgen receptor activity. While we can provide guidance for use of PSA monitoring in managing patients with advanced prostate cancer based on the data at hand, there is an urgent need for prospective analyses of refined PSA metrics in conjunction with newer prostate cancer biomarkers in clinical trials to provide stronger evidence for their roles as surrogate endpoints.