Female urinary incontinence and intravaginal electrical stimulation: an observational prospective study

• Published in: European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2013-09, Vol.170 (1), p.275-280
• Main Authors: Chêne, Gautier, Mansoor, Aslam, Jacquetin, Bernard, Mellier, Georges, Douvier, Serge, Sergent, Fabrice, Aubard, Yves, Seffert, Pierre
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Electric Stimulation Therapy; Female; Health-related quality of life; Humans; Intravaginal electrical stimulation; Middle Aged; Non-invasive; Obstetrics and Gynecology; Pelvic Floor - physiopathology; Pelvic floor training; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Urinary incontinence; Urinary Incontinence - physiopathology; Urinary Incontinence - therapy; Vagina - physiology; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0301-2115; 1872-7654
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.06.011

Abstract Objective To assess the efficacy of intravaginal electrical stimulation in the management of female urinary incontinence. Study design 359 Women with urinary incontinence (207 with stress incontinence [group A], 33 with urge incontinence [group B] and 119 with mixed urinary incontinence [group C]) were included in this multicenter prospective observational study. Patients were managed by home intravaginal electrical stimulation of the pelvic floor for 20–30 min per day, 5 days a week, for a period of 10 weeks. Identical clinical assessments were performed before and after pelvic floor rehabilitation, comprising a voiding diary and validated symptom and quality of life scores. Results Objective assessment demonstrated an overall cure rate of 63.5% (228/359): 65.7% (136/207) for group A, 57.6% (19/33) for group B, and 61.3% (73/119) for group C. The overall significant improvement rate was 15.6% (56/359): 14.6% (30/207) for group A, 24.2% (8/33) for group B and 15.1% (18/119) for group C. All domains of quality of life were significantly improved after pelvic floor muscle training ( p < 0.0001) with a patient satisfaction rate of 83.6%. Treatment was well tolerated with 1.4% (5/359) of patients describing pain at the highest stimulation intensities. No significant difference was observed between the various types of electrodes used ( p < 0.0001). Conclusion The quantitative and qualitative efficacy in terms of social and psychological consequences and quality of life of home pelvic floor muscle training stimulators probably make this treatment modality one of the first-line treatments for female stress urinary incontinence.