Feasibility of selection for male contribution to embryo survival as a way of improving male reproductive performance and semen quality in rabbits

• Published in: Journal of animal science 2013-10, Vol.91 (10), p.4654-4658
• Main Authors: Piles, M, Mocé, M L, Laborda, P, Santacreu, M A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abortion, Veterinary - genetics; Animals; Breeding; Female; Male; Pregnancy; Pregnancy, Animal - genetics; Rabbits; Reproduction - genetics; Selection, Genetic; Semen Analysis - veterinary
• ISSN: 1525-3163
• DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-6446

The objective of this research was assess the male contribution to the number of implanted embryos (IE) and embryo survival (ES) estimated as the rate of variance due to male genetic and permanent environmental effects regarding total variance. In prolific species, the number of embryos and ES at early stages of gestation could be considered as fertility measurements because it indicates the number and rate of fertilized ova which are able to initiate the embryo development. Analyzed traits were ovulation rate (OR) estimated as the number of corpora lutea in both ovaries, IE estimated as the number of implantation sites, and ES calculated as IE/OR. A total of 1477 records from 900 females were used to analyze OR, whereas 1081 records from 855 females and 201 males were used to analyze IE and ES. The number of animals in the pedigree was 1107. The model included the systematic effects of year-season, parity order, lactation, and the random effects of additive genetics and permanent environmental effects due to the female (for OR) or both sexes (for IE and ES). Gibbs sampling was used to estimate posterior distributions of model parameters. The heritabilities of the male contribution to IE and ES were low (0.05 [0.01, 0.10] and 0.07 [0.02, 0.12]) but these estimates are probably biased downward since laparoscopy was only performed on those does that were pregnant at d 12 of gestation, instead of on all mated does. The genetic correlations between all analyzed traits and also between male and female genetic components of IE and ES were inaccurate, and it was not possible to draw any conclusion about them. The proportion of variation due to the male nonadditive genetic plus permanent environmental effects for IE and ES was almost negligible (0.027 [0.001, 0.058] and 0.031 [0.002, 0.068] for IE and ES, respectively), being the repeatability for male contribution on IE and ES around 8 and 10%, respectively.