Loading…

Performance of a UV-assisted Hydrogen-peroxide-fed Spray Tower for Sulfur Dioxide Abatement

Spray towers are widely used for controlling air pollution by gases such as SO2, CO2, NOx, and HCl. Results of sulfur dioxide absorption in a spray tower using solutions of 1 g L–1 and 2 g L–1 of hydrogen peroxide are reported. For comparison, a water and sodium hydroxide solution was also used for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Chemical engineering & technology 2013-07, Vol.36 (7), p.1255-1260
Main Authors: Codolo, M., Bizzo, W., Bertazzoli, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Spray towers are widely used for controlling air pollution by gases such as SO2, CO2, NOx, and HCl. Results of sulfur dioxide absorption in a spray tower using solutions of 1 g L–1 and 2 g L–1 of hydrogen peroxide are reported. For comparison, a water and sodium hydroxide solution was also used for SO2 abatement. The results indicate that H2O2 may be an important alternative for SO2 removal in spray towers. A set of experimental removal efficiency data was obtained as a function of gas and liquid flow rates. Volumetric mass transfer coefficients (kga) were calculated and an experimental relationship among kga, gas, and liquid flow rates was proposed. As a final experiment, an oxidation process assisted by UV radiation using a 1 g L–1 solution of H2O2 was carried out to speed up the SO2 removal rate. The results obtained in this condition are similar to those achieved with a solution of 2 g L–1 H2O2. Results of SO2 absorption in a spray tower using hydrogen peroxide solutions are investigated. For comparison, a H2O and NaOH solution was also used. A correlation is proposed, which shows the strong influence of the liquid flow rate. The results indicate that H2O2 is an important alternative for SO2 removal in spray towers.
ISSN:0930-7516
1521-4125
DOI:10.1002/ceat.201200699