Neoadjuvant oxaliplatin and capecitabine and bevacizumab without radiotherapy for poor-risk rectal cancer: N-SOG 03 Phase II trial

• Published in: Japanese journal of clinical oncology 2013-10, Vol.43 (10), p.964-971
• Main Authors: Uehara, Keisuke, Hiramatsu, Kazuhiro, Maeda, Atsuyuki, Sakamoto, Eiji, Inoue, Masaya, Kobayashi, Satoshi, Tojima, Yuichiro, Yoshioka, Yuichiro, Nakayama, Goro, Yatsuya, Hiroshi, Ohmiya, Naoki, Goto, Hidemi, Nagino, Masato
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration & dosage; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - adverse effects; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - administration & dosage; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use; Bevacizumab; Capecitabine; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Deoxycytidine - administration & dosage; Deoxycytidine - adverse effects; Deoxycytidine - analogs & derivatives; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Fluorouracil - administration & dosage; Fluorouracil - adverse effects; Fluorouracil - analogs & derivatives; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multimodal Imaging; Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods; Organoplatinum Compounds - administration & dosage; Organoplatinum Compounds - adverse effects; Patient Selection; Positron-Emission Tomography; Prospective Studies; Rectal Neoplasms - drug therapy; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0368-2811; 1465-3621
• DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyt115

This Phase II trial was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant oxaliplatin and capecitabine and bevacizumab without radiotherapy in patients with poor-risk rectal cancer. Patients with magnetic resonance imaging-defined poor-risk rectal cancer received neoadjuvant oxaliplatin and capecitabine and bevacizumab followed by total mesorectal excision or more extensive surgery. Between February 2010 and December 2011, 32 patients were enrolled in this study. The completion rate of the scheduled chemotherapy was 91%. Reasons for withdrawal were refusal to continue therapy in two patients and disease progression in one, with two of these three patients not undergoing surgery. Among the 29 patients who completed the scheduled chemotherapy, one refused surgery within 8 weeks after the completion of chemotherapy, which was the period stipulated by the protocol, and another had rectal perforation, requiring urgent laparotomy. As a result, the completion rate of this experimental treatment was 84%. Of the 30 patients who underwent surgery, the R0 resection rate was 90% and a postoperative complication occurred in 43%. A pathological complete response was observed in 13% and good tumor regression was exhibited in 37%. Neoadjuvant oxaliplatin and capecitabine plus bevacizumab for poor-risk rectal cancer caused a high rate of anastomotic leakage and experienced a case with perforation during chemotherapy, both of which were bevacizumab-related toxicity. Although the short-term results with the completion rate of 84.4% and the pathological complete response rate of 13.3% were satisfactory, we have to reconsider the necessity of bevacizumab in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (UMIN number, 000003507).