Loading…

Second and third year oral health and dental student perceptions of future professional work

Objectives To explore and compare the ways dental and oral health students characterise their future professional work (FPW) at the end of their second and third professional years. Materials and methods Questionnaires were given to a cohort group of 48 dental students and 31 oral health students at...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of dental education 2013-11, Vol.17 (4), p.241-250
Main Authors: Tan, A. S., Anderson, V. R., Foster Page, L. A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives To explore and compare the ways dental and oral health students characterise their future professional work (FPW) at the end of their second and third professional years. Materials and methods Questionnaires were given to a cohort group of 48 dental students and 31 oral health students at the end of their second and third professional years at the University of Otago. Students' characterisations of their FPW were identified using an inductive approach, and the emphasis on each characterisation was confirmed using a ‘weighted’ table. Results Dental student response rates were 92% (in 2010) and 85% (in 2011); and oral health student response rates were 100% (in 2011) and 97% (in 2011). Students characterised their FPW in ten broad ways: in reference to treatment‐related concerns, patient‐related concerns, oral health promotion, oral health education, disease prevention and monitoring, communication, teamwork, maintaining an ideal clinical environment, maintaining a sense of self and improving quality of life. In both years, dental students emphasised treatment‐related concerns as central to their FPW and dealing with patient‐related concerns as a primary source of difficulty. Oral health students emphasised oral health promotion, oral health education, disease prevention and monitoring and restorative tasks as central to their FPW and dealing with patient‐related concerns as a primary source of difficulty. Conclusion Students' broad perceptions of their FPW changed little as they progressed through their programmes; however, their responses suggested the need for greater attention within their programmes to patient management and teamwork.
ISSN:1396-5883
1600-0579
DOI:10.1111/eje.12057