Models of College Entry in the United States and the Challenges of Estimating Primary and Secondary Effects

In recent work in the sociology of education, the primary effects of stratification are defined as the effects of social class origins on preparation for future educational attainment. The secondary effects are then the net direct effects of social class on the transition to the next higher level of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sociological methods & research 2012-02, Vol.41 (1), p.17-56
Main Author: Morgan, Stephen L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Alternative Approaches
Causal analysis
Causal inference
Causality
Choices
College admissions
College Students
Educational Attainment
Educational sociology
Higher education
Research methods
Secondary Education
Social Class
Sociological research
Sociology of Education
Sociology of Work
Transitions
U.S.A
United States of America
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In recent work in the sociology of education, the primary effects of stratification are defined as the effects of social class origins on preparation for future educational attainment. The secondary effects are then the net direct effects of social class on the transition to the next higher level of education, which are interpreted as average effects of class conditions on students’ choices. In this article, the standard model of primary and secondary effects is laid out in explicit form, and primary and secondary effects are then estimated for college entry among recent high school graduates in the United States. The challenges of estimating these effects for educational transitions in the United States are then explained, focusing on the weak warrant for causal inference that is used to justify the calculation of counterfactual net differences across classes. Alternative estimates of associational primary and secondary effects are then offered, after which the prospects for the identification of causal secondary effects by conditioning on additional confounders are assessed. In conclusion, an appeal is made for attention to the policy-relevant patterns of heterogeneity that research on primary and secondary effects may be able to reveal, and a case is made for elaboration and direct identification of the presupposed choice mechanism that has been assumed to generate secondary effects in past research.
ISSN:0049-1241
1552-8294
DOI:10.1177/0049124112440797