Pinus contorta growth in northern Sweden as affected by soil scarification

The aim of this study was to quantify the effects of different soil scarification methods on tree growth. Soil scarification influenced stem volume and stem biomass yield of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. var. latifolia Engelm.) in a 17-year-old field trial in boreal Sweden. Soil scarificatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:New forests 2003-11, Vol.26 (3), p.217-231
Main Authors: MATTSSON, Stefan, BERGSTEN, Urban
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological and medical sciences
Biomass
Evergreen trees
Forest soils
Forestry
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Pine trees
Plant growth
Soils
Trees
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of this study was to quantify the effects of different soil scarification methods on tree growth. Soil scarification influenced stem volume and stem biomass yield of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. var. latifolia Engelm.) in a 17-year-old field trial in boreal Sweden. Soil scarification (disc trenching, mounding and ploughing) resulted in an average stem volume yield of 3.1 and 34.2 m^sup 3^ ha^sup -1^ on the poor and intermediate sites, respectively, while corresponding values for no soil scarification were 0.9 and 16.7 m^sup 3^ ha^sup -1^. In comparison to no scarification, ploughing increased volume yields by 500% on the poor site and by 200% on the intermediate sites. The ranking according to stem volume yield was ploughing > disc trenching = mounding ≥ no soil scarification. Averaged over the two sites, the mean annual increment of stem biomass was 219% and 145% higher (in d.w., 0.26 kg and 0.34 kg per sample tree) after ploughing compared with no soil scarification, for the average and dominant sample trees, respectively. Although not significant, the increased growth rate after soil scarification decreased the average stem basic wood density of the sample trees with 1.6% and 5.3%, at the poor and intermediate sites, respectively. In conclusion, soil scarification significantly increased the 17-year stem volume yield compared with no scarification. The results also indicate that the difference in stem biomass yield between ploughing and the other methods, especially no soil scarification, will increase even more in the near future.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
ISSN:0169-4286
1573-5095
DOI:10.1023/A:1024425205712