A mathematical model for determining the optimal reflector position of a double exposure flat-plate solar collector

A double exposure, flat-plate solar collector (DEFPC) can absorb solar irradiation from both its upper and lower absorber surfaces (LAS). Absorption from the LAS is accomplished using a flat-plate reflector placed below and parallel to the collector. This paper presents a mathematical model for dete...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Renewable energy 2013-03, Vol.51, p.292-301
Main Authors: NIKOLIC, N, LUKIC, N
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accumulators
Applied sciences
Collectors
Computer simulation
Double exposure flat-plate solar collector
Energy
Exact sciences and technology
Flat-plate reflector
Irradiated area
Irradiation
Mathematical model
Mathematical models
Natural energy
Optimization
Reflectors
Solar collectors
Solar energy
Solar thermal conversion
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A double exposure, flat-plate solar collector (DEFPC) can absorb solar irradiation from both its upper and lower absorber surfaces (LAS). Absorption from the LAS is accomplished using a flat-plate reflector placed below and parallel to the collector. This paper presents a mathematical model for determining the optimum reflector position of the DEFPC in the condition where the LAS is fully irradiated. Compared to other models, this model enables the calculation of the instantaneously irradiated area of the LAS for arbitrary finite dimensions of the reflector and the collector, their arbitrary mutual positions and at any position of the sun in the sky. The optimum reflector positions were obtained by simulating the model in FORTRAN for the spring (autumn) equinox and the winter and summer solstices. The simulations were performed for the optimal yearly position of the collector at 44° N Latitude (Kragujevac, Serbia) and for equal dimensions of the collector and the reflector whose minimum dimensions allow the full irradiation of the LAS. The model was experimentally verified, and the range of the reflector movement during a single year, as well as the optimal reflector dimensions for minimum movement, was determined. ► We presented mathematical model for optimal reflector position of the DEFPC. ► The collector and reflector are parallel and reflector is placed below collector. ► For 21.03, 22.06 and 22.12, optimal reflector position and path were determined. ► The range of the reflector movement during a year is determined. ► The optimal reflector dimensions for its minimum moving, were determined.
ISSN:0960-1481
1879-0682
DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2012.09.034