Loading…

Peer assessment among first year medical students in anatomy

Peer assessment has been shown to be an effective tool to promote professionalism in medical students. Peer assessment may be particularly useful in anatomy dissection laboratory as the required close collaboration and long hours of anatomy laboratory provide students insights into their peers'...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anatomical sciences education 2014-03, Vol.7 (2), p.144-152
Main Authors: Spandorfer, John, Puklus, Tanya, Rose, Victoria, Vahedi, Mithaq, Collins, Lauren, Giordano, Carolyn, Schmidt, Richard, Braster, Chris
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4094-4c7bf2d326b2d6c0705a1ed892a7347bb8eca2516c37c3f6722d15bb236bb7de3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4094-4c7bf2d326b2d6c0705a1ed892a7347bb8eca2516c37c3f6722d15bb236bb7de3
container_end_page 152
container_issue 2
container_start_page 144
container_title Anatomical sciences education
container_volume 7
creator Spandorfer, John
Puklus, Tanya
Rose, Victoria
Vahedi, Mithaq
Collins, Lauren
Giordano, Carolyn
Schmidt, Richard
Braster, Chris
description Peer assessment has been shown to be an effective tool to promote professionalism in medical students. Peer assessment may be particularly useful in anatomy dissection laboratory as the required close collaboration and long hours of anatomy laboratory provide students insights into their peers' work habits and interpersonal skills. The objective of this study was to quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the use of a validated peer assessment tool in Gross Anatomy. Students in a first year medical school class evaluated three members of their dissection group using an online survey tool. The mid‐course and end‐of‐course evaluation included open‐ended comments, as well as a five‐point scale that measured three work habits, two interpersonal attributes and one overall score. All 267 students completed the assignment. The overall score and four of the five other assessed categories showed significant improvement from the mid‐ to end‐of‐course evaluations. Quantitative and qualitative data also revealed significant improvement among the students who received the lowest mid‐course assessments. Seventy‐six percent of the class agreed with the statement: “Based on the feedback I received, I made a change in how I worked with or taught my peers.” The use of this peer assessment tool used by students in anatomy was associated with improvements in work habits and interpersonal attributes, particularly by the cohort of students who received the lowest mid‐course feedback. Peer assessment offers students an opportunity to improve their interpersonal skills and work habits. Anat Sci Educ 7: 144–152. © 2013 American Association of Anatomists.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ase.1394
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1503550549</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1025972</ericid><sourcerecordid>3230091481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4094-4c7bf2d326b2d6c0705a1ed892a7347bb8eca2516c37c3f6722d15bb236bb7de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10NtKJDEQBuAgimfwBVwa9sab1hw6nQl4IzqeGA-oy8LehCRdvbT2wU11o_P2ZpjZEQSvUlAff4WfkD1GDxml_MgiHDKhsxWyybSQqVYjurqcFd8gW4jPlOaUSb5ONrjQUitNN8nxPUBILCIgNtD2iW269m9SVgH7ZAo2JA0Ulbd1gv1QRIBJ1Sa2tX3XTHfIWmlrhN3Fu01-nY-fTi_Tyd3F1enJJPUZ1VmaeeVKXgieO17knioqLYNipLlVIlPOjcBbLlnuhfKizBXnBZPOcZE7pwoQ2-Rgnvsaun8DYG-aCj3UtW2hG9AwSYWUVGY60p9f6HM3hDb-bqaY5hlX7DPQhw4xQGleQ9XYMDWMmlmjJjZqZo1G-mMROLhYxRL-rzCC_TmAUPnlenzNKI-Ax306379VNUy_PWROHseLgwtfYQ_vS2_Di8mVUNL8vr0wk5szwf7cPhghPgBL9pY1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1501924271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peer assessment among first year medical students in anatomy</title><source>Wiley</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Spandorfer, John ; Puklus, Tanya ; Rose, Victoria ; Vahedi, Mithaq ; Collins, Lauren ; Giordano, Carolyn ; Schmidt, Richard ; Braster, Chris</creator><creatorcontrib>Spandorfer, John ; Puklus, Tanya ; Rose, Victoria ; Vahedi, Mithaq ; Collins, Lauren ; Giordano, Carolyn ; Schmidt, Richard ; Braster, Chris</creatorcontrib><description>Peer assessment has been shown to be an effective tool to promote professionalism in medical students. Peer assessment may be particularly useful in anatomy dissection laboratory as the required close collaboration and long hours of anatomy laboratory provide students insights into their peers' work habits and interpersonal skills. The objective of this study was to quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the use of a validated peer assessment tool in Gross Anatomy. Students in a first year medical school class evaluated three members of their dissection group using an online survey tool. The mid‐course and end‐of‐course evaluation included open‐ended comments, as well as a five‐point scale that measured three work habits, two interpersonal attributes and one overall score. All 267 students completed the assignment. The overall score and four of the five other assessed categories showed significant improvement from the mid‐ to end‐of‐course evaluations. Quantitative and qualitative data also revealed significant improvement among the students who received the lowest mid‐course assessments. Seventy‐six percent of the class agreed with the statement: “Based on the feedback I received, I made a change in how I worked with or taught my peers.” The use of this peer assessment tool used by students in anatomy was associated with improvements in work habits and interpersonal attributes, particularly by the cohort of students who received the lowest mid‐course feedback. Peer assessment offers students an opportunity to improve their interpersonal skills and work habits. Anat Sci Educ 7: 144–152. © 2013 American Association of Anatomists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1935-9772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-9780</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ase.1394</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23959790</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anatomy ; Anatomy - education ; assessment ; Attitude Measures ; Cohort Analysis ; Communication ; Course Evaluation ; Data Analysis ; Educational Measurement - methods ; Feedback (Response) ; formative feedback ; gross anatomy education ; Humans ; Interpersonal Competence ; Interpersonal Relations ; medical education ; Medical Students ; Mixed Methods Research ; Online Surveys ; Peer Evaluation ; Peer Group ; peer-assessment ; Professional Competence ; professionalism ; Scores ; Student Attitudes ; Student Improvement ; Students, Medical ; summative feedback ; Test Taking Skills</subject><ispartof>Anatomical sciences education, 2014-03, Vol.7 (2), p.144-152</ispartof><rights>2013 American Association of Anatomists</rights><rights>2013 American Association of Anatomists.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4094-4c7bf2d326b2d6c0705a1ed892a7347bb8eca2516c37c3f6722d15bb236bb7de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4094-4c7bf2d326b2d6c0705a1ed892a7347bb8eca2516c37c3f6722d15bb236bb7de3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1025972$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23959790$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spandorfer, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puklus, Tanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahedi, Mithaq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braster, Chris</creatorcontrib><title>Peer assessment among first year medical students in anatomy</title><title>Anatomical sciences education</title><addtitle>American Association of Anatomists</addtitle><description>Peer assessment has been shown to be an effective tool to promote professionalism in medical students. Peer assessment may be particularly useful in anatomy dissection laboratory as the required close collaboration and long hours of anatomy laboratory provide students insights into their peers' work habits and interpersonal skills. The objective of this study was to quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the use of a validated peer assessment tool in Gross Anatomy. Students in a first year medical school class evaluated three members of their dissection group using an online survey tool. The mid‐course and end‐of‐course evaluation included open‐ended comments, as well as a five‐point scale that measured three work habits, two interpersonal attributes and one overall score. All 267 students completed the assignment. The overall score and four of the five other assessed categories showed significant improvement from the mid‐ to end‐of‐course evaluations. Quantitative and qualitative data also revealed significant improvement among the students who received the lowest mid‐course assessments. Seventy‐six percent of the class agreed with the statement: “Based on the feedback I received, I made a change in how I worked with or taught my peers.” The use of this peer assessment tool used by students in anatomy was associated with improvements in work habits and interpersonal attributes, particularly by the cohort of students who received the lowest mid‐course feedback. Peer assessment offers students an opportunity to improve their interpersonal skills and work habits. Anat Sci Educ 7: 144–152. © 2013 American Association of Anatomists.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Anatomy - education</subject><subject>assessment</subject><subject>Attitude Measures</subject><subject>Cohort Analysis</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Course Evaluation</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>formative feedback</subject><subject>gross anatomy education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal Competence</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>medical education</subject><subject>Medical Students</subject><subject>Mixed Methods Research</subject><subject>Online Surveys</subject><subject>Peer Evaluation</subject><subject>Peer Group</subject><subject>peer-assessment</subject><subject>Professional Competence</subject><subject>professionalism</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Improvement</subject><subject>Students, Medical</subject><subject>summative feedback</subject><subject>Test Taking Skills</subject><issn>1935-9772</issn><issn>1935-9780</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp10NtKJDEQBuAgimfwBVwa9sab1hw6nQl4IzqeGA-oy8LehCRdvbT2wU11o_P2ZpjZEQSvUlAff4WfkD1GDxml_MgiHDKhsxWyybSQqVYjurqcFd8gW4jPlOaUSb5ONrjQUitNN8nxPUBILCIgNtD2iW269m9SVgH7ZAo2JA0Ulbd1gv1QRIBJ1Sa2tX3XTHfIWmlrhN3Fu01-nY-fTi_Tyd3F1enJJPUZ1VmaeeVKXgieO17knioqLYNipLlVIlPOjcBbLlnuhfKizBXnBZPOcZE7pwoQ2-Rgnvsaun8DYG-aCj3UtW2hG9AwSYWUVGY60p9f6HM3hDb-bqaY5hlX7DPQhw4xQGleQ9XYMDWMmlmjJjZqZo1G-mMROLhYxRL-rzCC_TmAUPnlenzNKI-Ax306379VNUy_PWROHseLgwtfYQ_vS2_Di8mVUNL8vr0wk5szwf7cPhghPgBL9pY1</recordid><startdate>201403</startdate><enddate>201403</enddate><creator>Spandorfer, John</creator><creator>Puklus, Tanya</creator><creator>Rose, Victoria</creator><creator>Vahedi, Mithaq</creator><creator>Collins, Lauren</creator><creator>Giordano, Carolyn</creator><creator>Schmidt, Richard</creator><creator>Braster, Chris</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201403</creationdate><title>Peer assessment among first year medical students in anatomy</title><author>Spandorfer, John ; Puklus, Tanya ; Rose, Victoria ; Vahedi, Mithaq ; Collins, Lauren ; Giordano, Carolyn ; Schmidt, Richard ; Braster, Chris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4094-4c7bf2d326b2d6c0705a1ed892a7347bb8eca2516c37c3f6722d15bb236bb7de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Anatomy - education</topic><topic>assessment</topic><topic>Attitude Measures</topic><topic>Cohort Analysis</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Course Evaluation</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>formative feedback</topic><topic>gross anatomy education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal Competence</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>medical education</topic><topic>Medical Students</topic><topic>Mixed Methods Research</topic><topic>Online Surveys</topic><topic>Peer Evaluation</topic><topic>Peer Group</topic><topic>peer-assessment</topic><topic>Professional Competence</topic><topic>professionalism</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Improvement</topic><topic>Students, Medical</topic><topic>summative feedback</topic><topic>Test Taking Skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spandorfer, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puklus, Tanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahedi, Mithaq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braster, Chris</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anatomical sciences education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spandorfer, John</au><au>Puklus, Tanya</au><au>Rose, Victoria</au><au>Vahedi, Mithaq</au><au>Collins, Lauren</au><au>Giordano, Carolyn</au><au>Schmidt, Richard</au><au>Braster, Chris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1025972</ericid><atitle>Peer assessment among first year medical students in anatomy</atitle><jtitle>Anatomical sciences education</jtitle><addtitle>American Association of Anatomists</addtitle><date>2014-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>144</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>144-152</pages><issn>1935-9772</issn><eissn>1935-9780</eissn><abstract>Peer assessment has been shown to be an effective tool to promote professionalism in medical students. Peer assessment may be particularly useful in anatomy dissection laboratory as the required close collaboration and long hours of anatomy laboratory provide students insights into their peers' work habits and interpersonal skills. The objective of this study was to quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the use of a validated peer assessment tool in Gross Anatomy. Students in a first year medical school class evaluated three members of their dissection group using an online survey tool. The mid‐course and end‐of‐course evaluation included open‐ended comments, as well as a five‐point scale that measured three work habits, two interpersonal attributes and one overall score. All 267 students completed the assignment. The overall score and four of the five other assessed categories showed significant improvement from the mid‐ to end‐of‐course evaluations. Quantitative and qualitative data also revealed significant improvement among the students who received the lowest mid‐course assessments. Seventy‐six percent of the class agreed with the statement: “Based on the feedback I received, I made a change in how I worked with or taught my peers.” The use of this peer assessment tool used by students in anatomy was associated with improvements in work habits and interpersonal attributes, particularly by the cohort of students who received the lowest mid‐course feedback. Peer assessment offers students an opportunity to improve their interpersonal skills and work habits. Anat Sci Educ 7: 144–152. © 2013 American Association of Anatomists.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23959790</pmid><doi>10.1002/ase.1394</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1935-9772
ispartof Anatomical sciences education, 2014-03, Vol.7 (2), p.144-152
issn 1935-9772
1935-9780
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1503550549
source Wiley; ERIC
subjects Adult
Anatomy
Anatomy - education
assessment
Attitude Measures
Cohort Analysis
Communication
Course Evaluation
Data Analysis
Educational Measurement - methods
Feedback (Response)
formative feedback
gross anatomy education
Humans
Interpersonal Competence
Interpersonal Relations
medical education
Medical Students
Mixed Methods Research
Online Surveys
Peer Evaluation
Peer Group
peer-assessment
Professional Competence
professionalism
Scores
Student Attitudes
Student Improvement
Students, Medical
summative feedback
Test Taking Skills
title Peer assessment among first year medical students in anatomy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T00%3A06%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peer%20assessment%20among%20first%20year%20medical%20students%20in%20anatomy&rft.jtitle=Anatomical%20sciences%20education&rft.au=Spandorfer,%20John&rft.date=2014-03&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=144&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=144-152&rft.issn=1935-9772&rft.eissn=1935-9780&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ase.1394&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3230091481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4094-4c7bf2d326b2d6c0705a1ed892a7347bb8eca2516c37c3f6722d15bb236bb7de3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1501924271&rft_id=info:pmid/23959790&rft_ericid=EJ1025972&rfr_iscdi=true