Loading…
Peer assessment among first year medical students in anatomy
Peer assessment has been shown to be an effective tool to promote professionalism in medical students. Peer assessment may be particularly useful in anatomy dissection laboratory as the required close collaboration and long hours of anatomy laboratory provide students insights into their peers'...
Saved in:
Published in: | Anatomical sciences education 2014-03, Vol.7 (2), p.144-152 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4094-4c7bf2d326b2d6c0705a1ed892a7347bb8eca2516c37c3f6722d15bb236bb7de3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4094-4c7bf2d326b2d6c0705a1ed892a7347bb8eca2516c37c3f6722d15bb236bb7de3 |
container_end_page | 152 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 144 |
container_title | Anatomical sciences education |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Spandorfer, John Puklus, Tanya Rose, Victoria Vahedi, Mithaq Collins, Lauren Giordano, Carolyn Schmidt, Richard Braster, Chris |
description | Peer assessment has been shown to be an effective tool to promote professionalism in medical students. Peer assessment may be particularly useful in anatomy dissection laboratory as the required close collaboration and long hours of anatomy laboratory provide students insights into their peers' work habits and interpersonal skills. The objective of this study was to quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the use of a validated peer assessment tool in Gross Anatomy. Students in a first year medical school class evaluated three members of their dissection group using an online survey tool. The mid‐course and end‐of‐course evaluation included open‐ended comments, as well as a five‐point scale that measured three work habits, two interpersonal attributes and one overall score. All 267 students completed the assignment. The overall score and four of the five other assessed categories showed significant improvement from the mid‐ to end‐of‐course evaluations. Quantitative and qualitative data also revealed significant improvement among the students who received the lowest mid‐course assessments. Seventy‐six percent of the class agreed with the statement: “Based on the feedback I received, I made a change in how I worked with or taught my peers.” The use of this peer assessment tool used by students in anatomy was associated with improvements in work habits and interpersonal attributes, particularly by the cohort of students who received the lowest mid‐course feedback. Peer assessment offers students an opportunity to improve their interpersonal skills and work habits. Anat Sci Educ 7: 144–152. © 2013 American Association of Anatomists. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ase.1394 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1503550549</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1025972</ericid><sourcerecordid>3230091481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4094-4c7bf2d326b2d6c0705a1ed892a7347bb8eca2516c37c3f6722d15bb236bb7de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10NtKJDEQBuAgimfwBVwa9sab1hw6nQl4IzqeGA-oy8LehCRdvbT2wU11o_P2ZpjZEQSvUlAff4WfkD1GDxml_MgiHDKhsxWyybSQqVYjurqcFd8gW4jPlOaUSb5ONrjQUitNN8nxPUBILCIgNtD2iW269m9SVgH7ZAo2JA0Ulbd1gv1QRIBJ1Sa2tX3XTHfIWmlrhN3Fu01-nY-fTi_Tyd3F1enJJPUZ1VmaeeVKXgieO17knioqLYNipLlVIlPOjcBbLlnuhfKizBXnBZPOcZE7pwoQ2-Rgnvsaun8DYG-aCj3UtW2hG9AwSYWUVGY60p9f6HM3hDb-bqaY5hlX7DPQhw4xQGleQ9XYMDWMmlmjJjZqZo1G-mMROLhYxRL-rzCC_TmAUPnlenzNKI-Ax306379VNUy_PWROHseLgwtfYQ_vS2_Di8mVUNL8vr0wk5szwf7cPhghPgBL9pY1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1501924271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peer assessment among first year medical students in anatomy</title><source>Wiley</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Spandorfer, John ; Puklus, Tanya ; Rose, Victoria ; Vahedi, Mithaq ; Collins, Lauren ; Giordano, Carolyn ; Schmidt, Richard ; Braster, Chris</creator><creatorcontrib>Spandorfer, John ; Puklus, Tanya ; Rose, Victoria ; Vahedi, Mithaq ; Collins, Lauren ; Giordano, Carolyn ; Schmidt, Richard ; Braster, Chris</creatorcontrib><description>Peer assessment has been shown to be an effective tool to promote professionalism in medical students. Peer assessment may be particularly useful in anatomy dissection laboratory as the required close collaboration and long hours of anatomy laboratory provide students insights into their peers' work habits and interpersonal skills. The objective of this study was to quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the use of a validated peer assessment tool in Gross Anatomy. Students in a first year medical school class evaluated three members of their dissection group using an online survey tool. The mid‐course and end‐of‐course evaluation included open‐ended comments, as well as a five‐point scale that measured three work habits, two interpersonal attributes and one overall score. All 267 students completed the assignment. The overall score and four of the five other assessed categories showed significant improvement from the mid‐ to end‐of‐course evaluations. Quantitative and qualitative data also revealed significant improvement among the students who received the lowest mid‐course assessments. Seventy‐six percent of the class agreed with the statement: “Based on the feedback I received, I made a change in how I worked with or taught my peers.” The use of this peer assessment tool used by students in anatomy was associated with improvements in work habits and interpersonal attributes, particularly by the cohort of students who received the lowest mid‐course feedback. Peer assessment offers students an opportunity to improve their interpersonal skills and work habits. Anat Sci Educ 7: 144–152. © 2013 American Association of Anatomists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1935-9772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-9780</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ase.1394</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23959790</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anatomy ; Anatomy - education ; assessment ; Attitude Measures ; Cohort Analysis ; Communication ; Course Evaluation ; Data Analysis ; Educational Measurement - methods ; Feedback (Response) ; formative feedback ; gross anatomy education ; Humans ; Interpersonal Competence ; Interpersonal Relations ; medical education ; Medical Students ; Mixed Methods Research ; Online Surveys ; Peer Evaluation ; Peer Group ; peer-assessment ; Professional Competence ; professionalism ; Scores ; Student Attitudes ; Student Improvement ; Students, Medical ; summative feedback ; Test Taking Skills</subject><ispartof>Anatomical sciences education, 2014-03, Vol.7 (2), p.144-152</ispartof><rights>2013 American Association of Anatomists</rights><rights>2013 American Association of Anatomists.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4094-4c7bf2d326b2d6c0705a1ed892a7347bb8eca2516c37c3f6722d15bb236bb7de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4094-4c7bf2d326b2d6c0705a1ed892a7347bb8eca2516c37c3f6722d15bb236bb7de3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1025972$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23959790$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spandorfer, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puklus, Tanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahedi, Mithaq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braster, Chris</creatorcontrib><title>Peer assessment among first year medical students in anatomy</title><title>Anatomical sciences education</title><addtitle>American Association of Anatomists</addtitle><description>Peer assessment has been shown to be an effective tool to promote professionalism in medical students. Peer assessment may be particularly useful in anatomy dissection laboratory as the required close collaboration and long hours of anatomy laboratory provide students insights into their peers' work habits and interpersonal skills. The objective of this study was to quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the use of a validated peer assessment tool in Gross Anatomy. Students in a first year medical school class evaluated three members of their dissection group using an online survey tool. The mid‐course and end‐of‐course evaluation included open‐ended comments, as well as a five‐point scale that measured three work habits, two interpersonal attributes and one overall score. All 267 students completed the assignment. The overall score and four of the five other assessed categories showed significant improvement from the mid‐ to end‐of‐course evaluations. Quantitative and qualitative data also revealed significant improvement among the students who received the lowest mid‐course assessments. Seventy‐six percent of the class agreed with the statement: “Based on the feedback I received, I made a change in how I worked with or taught my peers.” The use of this peer assessment tool used by students in anatomy was associated with improvements in work habits and interpersonal attributes, particularly by the cohort of students who received the lowest mid‐course feedback. Peer assessment offers students an opportunity to improve their interpersonal skills and work habits. Anat Sci Educ 7: 144–152. © 2013 American Association of Anatomists.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Anatomy - education</subject><subject>assessment</subject><subject>Attitude Measures</subject><subject>Cohort Analysis</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Course Evaluation</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>formative feedback</subject><subject>gross anatomy education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal Competence</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>medical education</subject><subject>Medical Students</subject><subject>Mixed Methods Research</subject><subject>Online Surveys</subject><subject>Peer Evaluation</subject><subject>Peer Group</subject><subject>peer-assessment</subject><subject>Professional Competence</subject><subject>professionalism</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Improvement</subject><subject>Students, Medical</subject><subject>summative feedback</subject><subject>Test Taking Skills</subject><issn>1935-9772</issn><issn>1935-9780</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp10NtKJDEQBuAgimfwBVwa9sab1hw6nQl4IzqeGA-oy8LehCRdvbT2wU11o_P2ZpjZEQSvUlAff4WfkD1GDxml_MgiHDKhsxWyybSQqVYjurqcFd8gW4jPlOaUSb5ONrjQUitNN8nxPUBILCIgNtD2iW269m9SVgH7ZAo2JA0Ulbd1gv1QRIBJ1Sa2tX3XTHfIWmlrhN3Fu01-nY-fTi_Tyd3F1enJJPUZ1VmaeeVKXgieO17knioqLYNipLlVIlPOjcBbLlnuhfKizBXnBZPOcZE7pwoQ2-Rgnvsaun8DYG-aCj3UtW2hG9AwSYWUVGY60p9f6HM3hDb-bqaY5hlX7DPQhw4xQGleQ9XYMDWMmlmjJjZqZo1G-mMROLhYxRL-rzCC_TmAUPnlenzNKI-Ax306379VNUy_PWROHseLgwtfYQ_vS2_Di8mVUNL8vr0wk5szwf7cPhghPgBL9pY1</recordid><startdate>201403</startdate><enddate>201403</enddate><creator>Spandorfer, John</creator><creator>Puklus, Tanya</creator><creator>Rose, Victoria</creator><creator>Vahedi, Mithaq</creator><creator>Collins, Lauren</creator><creator>Giordano, Carolyn</creator><creator>Schmidt, Richard</creator><creator>Braster, Chris</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201403</creationdate><title>Peer assessment among first year medical students in anatomy</title><author>Spandorfer, John ; Puklus, Tanya ; Rose, Victoria ; Vahedi, Mithaq ; Collins, Lauren ; Giordano, Carolyn ; Schmidt, Richard ; Braster, Chris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4094-4c7bf2d326b2d6c0705a1ed892a7347bb8eca2516c37c3f6722d15bb236bb7de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Anatomy - education</topic><topic>assessment</topic><topic>Attitude Measures</topic><topic>Cohort Analysis</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Course Evaluation</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>formative feedback</topic><topic>gross anatomy education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal Competence</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>medical education</topic><topic>Medical Students</topic><topic>Mixed Methods Research</topic><topic>Online Surveys</topic><topic>Peer Evaluation</topic><topic>Peer Group</topic><topic>peer-assessment</topic><topic>Professional Competence</topic><topic>professionalism</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Improvement</topic><topic>Students, Medical</topic><topic>summative feedback</topic><topic>Test Taking Skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spandorfer, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puklus, Tanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahedi, Mithaq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braster, Chris</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anatomical sciences education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spandorfer, John</au><au>Puklus, Tanya</au><au>Rose, Victoria</au><au>Vahedi, Mithaq</au><au>Collins, Lauren</au><au>Giordano, Carolyn</au><au>Schmidt, Richard</au><au>Braster, Chris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1025972</ericid><atitle>Peer assessment among first year medical students in anatomy</atitle><jtitle>Anatomical sciences education</jtitle><addtitle>American Association of Anatomists</addtitle><date>2014-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>144</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>144-152</pages><issn>1935-9772</issn><eissn>1935-9780</eissn><abstract>Peer assessment has been shown to be an effective tool to promote professionalism in medical students. Peer assessment may be particularly useful in anatomy dissection laboratory as the required close collaboration and long hours of anatomy laboratory provide students insights into their peers' work habits and interpersonal skills. The objective of this study was to quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the use of a validated peer assessment tool in Gross Anatomy. Students in a first year medical school class evaluated three members of their dissection group using an online survey tool. The mid‐course and end‐of‐course evaluation included open‐ended comments, as well as a five‐point scale that measured three work habits, two interpersonal attributes and one overall score. All 267 students completed the assignment. The overall score and four of the five other assessed categories showed significant improvement from the mid‐ to end‐of‐course evaluations. Quantitative and qualitative data also revealed significant improvement among the students who received the lowest mid‐course assessments. Seventy‐six percent of the class agreed with the statement: “Based on the feedback I received, I made a change in how I worked with or taught my peers.” The use of this peer assessment tool used by students in anatomy was associated with improvements in work habits and interpersonal attributes, particularly by the cohort of students who received the lowest mid‐course feedback. Peer assessment offers students an opportunity to improve their interpersonal skills and work habits. Anat Sci Educ 7: 144–152. © 2013 American Association of Anatomists.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23959790</pmid><doi>10.1002/ase.1394</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1935-9772 |
ispartof | Anatomical sciences education, 2014-03, Vol.7 (2), p.144-152 |
issn | 1935-9772 1935-9780 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1503550549 |
source | Wiley; ERIC |
subjects | Adult Anatomy Anatomy - education assessment Attitude Measures Cohort Analysis Communication Course Evaluation Data Analysis Educational Measurement - methods Feedback (Response) formative feedback gross anatomy education Humans Interpersonal Competence Interpersonal Relations medical education Medical Students Mixed Methods Research Online Surveys Peer Evaluation Peer Group peer-assessment Professional Competence professionalism Scores Student Attitudes Student Improvement Students, Medical summative feedback Test Taking Skills |
title | Peer assessment among first year medical students in anatomy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T00%3A06%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peer%20assessment%20among%20first%20year%20medical%20students%20in%20anatomy&rft.jtitle=Anatomical%20sciences%20education&rft.au=Spandorfer,%20John&rft.date=2014-03&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=144&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=144-152&rft.issn=1935-9772&rft.eissn=1935-9780&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ase.1394&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3230091481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4094-4c7bf2d326b2d6c0705a1ed892a7347bb8eca2516c37c3f6722d15bb236bb7de3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1501924271&rft_id=info:pmid/23959790&rft_ericid=EJ1025972&rfr_iscdi=true |