Loading…

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as a novel method of remote preconditioning: in vitro validation in an animal model and first human observations

Remote ischemic preconditioning (rIPC) induced by transient limb ischemia (li-rIPC) leads to neurally dependent release of blood-borne factors that provide potent cardioprotection. We hypothesized that transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a clinically relevant stimulus of rIPC. Stud...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Basic research in cardiology 2014-05, Vol.109 (3), p.406-406, Article 406
Main Authors: Merlocco, Anthony C., Redington, Kathrine L., Disenhouse, Tara, Strantzas, Samuel C., Gladstone, Rachel, Wei, Can, Tropak, Michael B., Manlhiot, Cedric, Li, Jing, Redington, Andrew N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Remote ischemic preconditioning (rIPC) induced by transient limb ischemia (li-rIPC) leads to neurally dependent release of blood-borne factors that provide potent cardioprotection. We hypothesized that transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a clinically relevant stimulus of rIPC. Study 1: seven rabbits were subjected to lower limb TENS; six to li-rIPC, and six to sham intervention. Blood was drawn and used to prepare a dialysate for subsequent analysis of cardioprotection in rabbit Langendorff preparation. Study 2: 14 healthy adults underwent upper limb TENS stimulation on one study day, 10 of whom also underwent li-rIPC on another study day. Blood was drawn before and after each stimulus, dialysate prepared, and cardioprotective activity assessed in mouse Langendorff preparation. The infarct size and myocardial recovery were measured after 30 min of global ischemia and 60 or 120 min of reperfusion. Animal validation: compared to control, TENS induced marked cardioprotection with significantly reduced infarct size (TENS vs. sham p  
ISSN:0300-8428
1435-1803
DOI:10.1007/s00395-014-0406-0