Loading…
Long-term efficacy and safety of emtricitabine plus tenofovir DF vs. tenofovir DF monotherapy in adefovir-experienced chronic hepatitis B patients
Background & Aims Suboptimal virologic response to nucleos(t)ide analogs may represent a significant risk factor for resistance development in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection; treatment options have not been well studied. We evaluated long-term efficacy and safety of tenofovir...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of hepatology 2014-04, Vol.60 (4), p.715-722 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background & Aims Suboptimal virologic response to nucleos(t)ide analogs may represent a significant risk factor for resistance development in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection; treatment options have not been well studied. We evaluated long-term efficacy and safety of tenofovir alone and in combination with emtricitabine in a prospective, placebo-controlled trial in patients who remained viremic on adefovir therapy. Methods Hepatitis B e antigen-positive and -negative patients with hepatitis B virus DNA ⩾1000 copies/ml despite up to 96 weeks of adefovir were randomized to double-blind tenofovir or emtricitabine/tenofovir for 168 weeks. Patients with hepatitis B virus DNA ⩾400 copies/ml (⩾69 IU/ml) at or after week 24 could switch to open-label emtricitabine/tenofovir. Results Overall, 90/105 (86%) patients (46/53 tenofovir and 44/52 emtricitabine/tenofovir) completed the 168-week study period, including 74/105 (70%) patients (35/53 tenofovir and 39/52 emtricitabine/tenofovir) who completed the study on their initial randomized treatment. Long-term viral suppression (hepatitis B virus DNA |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0168-8278 1600-0641 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.11.024 |