The Effect of Medial and Lateral Calcaneal Osteotomies on the Tarsal Tunnel

• Published in: Foot & ankle international 2014-04, Vol.35 (4), p.383-388
• Main Authors: Bruce, Benjamin G., Bariteau, Jason T., Evangelista, Peter E., Arcuri, Daniel, Sandusky, Matthew, DiGiovanni, Christopher W.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cadaver; Calcaneus - surgery; Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Osteotomy - methods; Tarsal Joints - surgery; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 1071-1007; 1944-7876
• DOI: 10.1177/1071100713519599

Background: As an entrapment phenomenon, tarsal tunnel syndrome has been described after calcaneal osteotomy, and since the tibial nerve has also been shown to be very sensitive to ankle position, position of the calcaneus after osteotomy and displacement was thought to likely influence the environment of the tibial nerve within the tarsal canal. The respective volume of the tarsal canal was therefore hypothesized to decrease with medial or lateral displacement osteotomies of the calcaneus. Methods: Anterior and posterior calcaneal osteotomies were made in cadaveric matched pairs and brought through sequential medial and lateral displacements. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to estimate the comparative resultant volume of the tarsal canal after each of these new positions were assumed, as compared with baseline. The proximity of the osteotomy cut to the nerve’s location was also measured. Results: The tarsal tunnel volume was calculated for all 5 displacement states and were as follows: far-lateral (9506 mm3), near-lateral (10 073 mm3), normal (11 839 mm3), near-medial (11 489 mm3), and far-medial (11 760 mm3). No significant difference in tarsal tunnel volume was identified between the normal, nondisplaced specimens in the anterior or posterior groups (11 954 mm3 vs 11 809 mm3). No difference in tarsal tunnel volume was identified between the anterior and posterior osteotomies at any of the 4 displacements. The distance from tibial nerve to the medial exit site of the osteotomy was found to be significantly less in the anterior group compared to the posterior group (4 mm vs 14.2 mm, P < .0001). Conclusion: Lateral, but not medial, osteotomy fragment displacement results in significant reduction of tarsal tunnel volume. The location of the cut does not seem to affect any substantive change in volume. Anteriorly placed osteotomies appear to jeopardize the neurovascular structures more than posteriorly placed osteotomies. Clinical Relevance: These findings provide surgeons with clinical evidence in support of performing a prophylactic tarsal tunnel release for patients undergoing lateralizing calcaneal osteotomies.