Loading…
Quench of ITER Poloidal Field Coils: Influence of some initiation parameters on thermo-hydraulic detection signals and main impact on cryogenic system
► We model two extreme cases of quench of PF5 coil and secondary quench detection. ► One difficult to detect with 1m length initiation at the middle of the conductor. ► The other is one pancake quench on the first turn, and the whole coil (40 pancakes). ► We present the Cryogenic Consequences. ► Suc...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cryogenics (Guildford) 2013-01, Vol.53, p.86-93 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ► We model two extreme cases of quench of PF5 coil and secondary quench detection. ► One difficult to detect with 1m length initiation at the middle of the conductor. ► The other is one pancake quench on the first turn, and the whole coil (40 pancakes). ► We present the Cryogenic Consequences. ► Such as pressure, temperature and mass flow at the feeders and relief valves.
In case of a magnet quench, the primary quench detection system is classically based on voltage detection. In addition, a secondary quench detection is required and it could rely on signals of thermohydraulic nature. A model based on the coupled GANDALF [1] and FLOWER [2] codes has been developed in previous papers for the Central Solenoid [3,4], and for the Toroidal Field Coils [5,6] of ITER. This study focuses on Poloidal Field Coil PF5 as it has the highest magnetic field value along the conductor. Results of some parametric studies are presented and the influence of the initiation parameters of the quench (energy, location and length of heat deposition, time duration for detection). The possibility of a secondary thermohydraulic detection and the main impact on cryogenic system are analyzed and discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0011-2275 1879-2235 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2012.05.005 |