Delivering Local Plans: Recognising the Bounded Interests of Local Planners within Spatial Planning

In England spatial planning has been critiqued as being part of a postpolitical project which seeks to suppress the contested nature of policy and determining applications. A key aspect of this critique is that consensus overrides territoriality as the interface between local, bounded politics is un...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environment and planning. C, Government & policy Government & policy, 2013-12, Vol.31 (6), p.1133-1146
Main Author: Mace, Alan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Discourse
England
Local politics
Planning methods
Public policy
Spatial analysis
Territoriality
United Kingdom
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In England spatial planning has been critiqued as being part of a postpolitical project which seeks to suppress the contested nature of policy and determining applications. A key aspect of this critique is that consensus overrides territoriality as the interface between local, bounded politics is underplayed in favour of the relational nature of place. In this reading local planners may be seen as caught between their professional understanding of, and commitment to, relational space and the bounded nature of local politics that informs their political masters at the local level. However, drawing on experience of policy development in Islington, London, it is argued that planners can themselves employ a bounded discourse of place, independently of local political demands. The Coalition government's localism agenda extends the premise of spatial planning—promoting the local and/or place but giving primacy to accommodating externally driven change; this paper explores the implications for planning practice.
ISSN:0263-774X
1472-3425
DOI:10.1068/c11236