Loading…

The neural basis of sublexical speech and corresponding nonspeech processing: A combined EEG–MEG study

•We recorded simultaneous EEG–MEG to speech and matched nonspeech sound features.•Distinct neural substrates for speech and nonspeech processing were found.•The existence of preattentive cortical memory traces for speech features is supported.•Experience-dependent modulation of cortical processing d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brain and language 2014-03, Vol.130, p.19-32
Main Authors: Kuuluvainen, Soila, Nevalainen, Päivi, Sorokin, Alexander, Mittag, Maria, Partanen, Eino, Putkinen, Vesa, Seppänen, Miia, Kähkönen, Seppo, Kujala, Teija
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•We recorded simultaneous EEG–MEG to speech and matched nonspeech sound features.•Distinct neural substrates for speech and nonspeech processing were found.•The existence of preattentive cortical memory traces for speech features is supported.•Experience-dependent modulation of cortical processing differs between hemispheres. We addressed the neural organization of speech versus nonspeech sound processing by investigating preattentive cortical auditory processing of changes in five features of a consonant–vowel syllable (consonant, vowel, sound duration, frequency, and intensity) and their acoustically matched nonspeech counterparts in a simultaneous EEG–MEG recording of mismatch negativity (MMN/MMNm). Overall, speech–sound processing was enhanced compared to nonspeech sound processing. This effect was strongest for changes which affect word meaning (consonant, vowel, and vowel duration) in the left and for the vowel identity change in the right hemisphere also. Furthermore, in the right hemisphere, speech–sound frequency and intensity changes were processed faster than their nonspeech counterparts, and there was a trend for speech-enhancement in frequency processing. In summary, the results support the proposed existence of long-term memory traces for speech sounds in the auditory cortices, and indicate at least partly distinct neural substrates for speech and nonspeech sound processing.
ISSN:0093-934X
1090-2155
DOI:10.1016/j.bandl.2014.01.008