Loading…

Heating and cooling energy demand in underground buildings: Potential for saving in various climates and functions

•Energy saving potential of underground buildings is investigated using monthly calculations.•Compared aboveground and underground buildings for different climates and functions.•Underground buildings have energy saving potential, magnitude related to design elements.•Balance between underground tem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy and buildings 2014-03, Vol.71, p.129-136
Main Authors: van Dronkelaar, C., Cóstola, D., Mangkuto, R.A., Hensen, J.L.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Energy saving potential of underground buildings is investigated using monthly calculations.•Compared aboveground and underground buildings for different climates and functions.•Underground buildings have energy saving potential, magnitude related to design elements.•Balance between underground temperature and internal gains of high importance.•Sensitivity analysis indicates same trends are dominant in all climates and functions. Underground buildings are pointed out as alternatives to conventional aboveground buildings for reducing total energy requirements, while alleviating land use and location problems. This paper investigates the potential in reducing the heating and cooling energy demand of underground buildings compared to aboveground buildings. Monthly calculations based on EN-ISO 13790 are performed to obtain the annual heating and cooling energy demand of aboveground and underground buildings for various climates, building functions and underground depths. Uncertainty of input parameters is considered in the calculation, and sensitivity analysis is carried out. Energy reduction is achievable for all climates and functions when underground and aboveground buildings, but the magnitude is related to the combination of different design elements. Results show that 11% of cases analyzed can be considered near zero-energy buildings (annual energy demand less than 10kWh/m2y). Sensitivity analysis indicates that the most influential parameters depend on the climate and building function. As expected, building functions with high internal gains perform better in cold climates, and the ones with low internal gains perform better in hot climates.
ISSN:0378-7788
DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.12.004