Loading…
Vertebral body replacement with PEEK-cages after anterior corpectomy in multilevel cervical spinal stenosis: a clinical and radiological evaluation
Introduction A growing number of industrially manufactured implants have been developed in the last years for vertebral replacement in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)-cages are used in many centers, but outcome reports are scarce. This study assesses the c...
Saved in:
Published in: | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2014-05, Vol.134 (5), p.611-618 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3809a5bd2007715de578abc7cd0a14b1f440c79944bbbfd462b6debc05e9f00b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3809a5bd2007715de578abc7cd0a14b1f440c79944bbbfd462b6debc05e9f00b3 |
container_end_page | 618 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 611 |
container_title | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery |
container_volume | 134 |
creator | Raslan, Furat Koehler, Stefan Berg, Frank Rueckriegel, Stefan Ernestus, Ralf-Ingo Meinhardt, Matthias Westermaier, Thomas |
description | Introduction
A growing number of industrially manufactured implants have been developed in the last years for vertebral replacement in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)-cages are used in many centers, but outcome reports are scarce. This study assesses the clinical and radiological outcome after one- or two-level ACCF by the use of a PEEK-cage augmented by a plate–screw osteosynthesis.
Methods
A total of 21 patients received one-level (18 patients) or two-level (3 patients) ACCF by a PEEK-cage and plate–screw osteosynthesis for multilevel degenerative stenosis. The Visual Analogue Scale, Nurick Score, Neck Disability Index and European Myelopathy Score were used for clinical assessment. Radiological outcome—osseous fusion and loss of height—was evaluated by CT.
Results
The mean follow-up was 28 ± 12 months. In 19 patients, bony fusion was achieved after the primary operation. Graft failure that required surgical revision occurred in two patients. In these patients, osseous fusion was achieved after the second operation. Myelopathy improved significantly. The loss of height was 2.2 ± 2.3 and 5.3 ± 2.1 mm after one- and two-level ACCF, respectively.
Conclusion
Anterior corpectomy and fusion by a PEEK-cage and plate–screw osteosynthesis resulted in clinical improvement in all patients. Bony fusion was achieved in all patients in the long run. PEEK cages are allegedly less rigid than other xenografts. Similar to those, however, their use bears the risk of early cage-dislocation and subsidence. A comparison of industrial xenografts and autologous bone implants is required to challenge the different fusion techniques. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00402-014-1972-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1517882942</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2261979399</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3809a5bd2007715de578abc7cd0a14b1f440c79944bbbfd462b6debc05e9f00b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc-OFCEQh4nRuLOrD-DFkHjxggJN_8Gb2YyucRM9qFcCdPXIhoYW6NnMc_jCMjurJiZeqIT66keoD6FnjL5ilPavM6WCckKZIEz2nLAHaMNEI0gjWfcQbahsOjLQlp2h85xvKGV8kPQxOuOi67tOyA36-Q1SAZO0xyaOB5xg8drCDKHgW1e-48_b7Udi9Q4y1lOBhHWop4sJ25gWsCXOB-wCnldfnIc9eGwh7Z2tiXlx4VgKhJhdfoM1tt6Fu54OI056dNHH3d0F7LVfdXExPEGPJu0zPL2vF-jru-2Xyyty_en9h8u318Q2PS-kGajUrRl5XUXP2hHaftDG9nakmgnDJiGo7aUUwhgzjaLjphvBWNqCnCg1zQV6ecpdUvyxQi5qdtmC9zpAXLNiLeuHgUvBK_riH_Qmrql-LivOu7p82UhZKXaibIo5J5jUktys00Exqo7G1MmYqsbU0Zhideb5ffJqZhj_TPxWVAF-AnJthR2kv0__P_UXTFujug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2261979399</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vertebral body replacement with PEEK-cages after anterior corpectomy in multilevel cervical spinal stenosis: a clinical and radiological evaluation</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Raslan, Furat ; Koehler, Stefan ; Berg, Frank ; Rueckriegel, Stefan ; Ernestus, Ralf-Ingo ; Meinhardt, Matthias ; Westermaier, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Raslan, Furat ; Koehler, Stefan ; Berg, Frank ; Rueckriegel, Stefan ; Ernestus, Ralf-Ingo ; Meinhardt, Matthias ; Westermaier, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
A growing number of industrially manufactured implants have been developed in the last years for vertebral replacement in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)-cages are used in many centers, but outcome reports are scarce. This study assesses the clinical and radiological outcome after one- or two-level ACCF by the use of a PEEK-cage augmented by a plate–screw osteosynthesis.
Methods
A total of 21 patients received one-level (18 patients) or two-level (3 patients) ACCF by a PEEK-cage and plate–screw osteosynthesis for multilevel degenerative stenosis. The Visual Analogue Scale, Nurick Score, Neck Disability Index and European Myelopathy Score were used for clinical assessment. Radiological outcome—osseous fusion and loss of height—was evaluated by CT.
Results
The mean follow-up was 28 ± 12 months. In 19 patients, bony fusion was achieved after the primary operation. Graft failure that required surgical revision occurred in two patients. In these patients, osseous fusion was achieved after the second operation. Myelopathy improved significantly. The loss of height was 2.2 ± 2.3 and 5.3 ± 2.1 mm after one- and two-level ACCF, respectively.
Conclusion
Anterior corpectomy and fusion by a PEEK-cage and plate–screw osteosynthesis resulted in clinical improvement in all patients. Bony fusion was achieved in all patients in the long run. PEEK cages are allegedly less rigid than other xenografts. Similar to those, however, their use bears the risk of early cage-dislocation and subsidence. A comparison of industrial xenografts and autologous bone implants is required to challenge the different fusion techniques.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-8051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-3916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00402-014-1972-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24676649</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biocompatible Materials ; Bone Plates ; Bone Screws ; Cervical Vertebrae - surgery ; Decompression, Surgical - instrumentation ; Diskectomy - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Ketones ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Orthopaedic Surgery ; Orthopedics ; Polyethylene Glycols ; Prostheses and Implants ; Prosthesis Design ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Cord Diseases - surgery ; Spinal Fusion - instrumentation ; Spinal Fusion - methods ; Spinal stenosis ; Spinal Stenosis - surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2014-05, Vol.134 (5), p.611-618</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><rights>Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery is a copyright of Springer, (2014). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3809a5bd2007715de578abc7cd0a14b1f440c79944bbbfd462b6debc05e9f00b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3809a5bd2007715de578abc7cd0a14b1f440c79944bbbfd462b6debc05e9f00b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24676649$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raslan, Furat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koehler, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rueckriegel, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ernestus, Ralf-Ingo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meinhardt, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westermaier, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Vertebral body replacement with PEEK-cages after anterior corpectomy in multilevel cervical spinal stenosis: a clinical and radiological evaluation</title><title>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</title><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction
A growing number of industrially manufactured implants have been developed in the last years for vertebral replacement in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)-cages are used in many centers, but outcome reports are scarce. This study assesses the clinical and radiological outcome after one- or two-level ACCF by the use of a PEEK-cage augmented by a plate–screw osteosynthesis.
Methods
A total of 21 patients received one-level (18 patients) or two-level (3 patients) ACCF by a PEEK-cage and plate–screw osteosynthesis for multilevel degenerative stenosis. The Visual Analogue Scale, Nurick Score, Neck Disability Index and European Myelopathy Score were used for clinical assessment. Radiological outcome—osseous fusion and loss of height—was evaluated by CT.
Results
The mean follow-up was 28 ± 12 months. In 19 patients, bony fusion was achieved after the primary operation. Graft failure that required surgical revision occurred in two patients. In these patients, osseous fusion was achieved after the second operation. Myelopathy improved significantly. The loss of height was 2.2 ± 2.3 and 5.3 ± 2.1 mm after one- and two-level ACCF, respectively.
Conclusion
Anterior corpectomy and fusion by a PEEK-cage and plate–screw osteosynthesis resulted in clinical improvement in all patients. Bony fusion was achieved in all patients in the long run. PEEK cages are allegedly less rigid than other xenografts. Similar to those, however, their use bears the risk of early cage-dislocation and subsidence. A comparison of industrial xenografts and autologous bone implants is required to challenge the different fusion techniques.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Decompression, Surgical - instrumentation</subject><subject>Diskectomy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ketones</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopaedic Surgery</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - methods</subject><subject>Spinal stenosis</subject><subject>Spinal Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0936-8051</issn><issn>1434-3916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc-OFCEQh4nRuLOrD-DFkHjxggJN_8Gb2YyucRM9qFcCdPXIhoYW6NnMc_jCMjurJiZeqIT66keoD6FnjL5ilPavM6WCckKZIEz2nLAHaMNEI0gjWfcQbahsOjLQlp2h85xvKGV8kPQxOuOi67tOyA36-Q1SAZO0xyaOB5xg8drCDKHgW1e-48_b7Udi9Q4y1lOBhHWop4sJ25gWsCXOB-wCnldfnIc9eGwh7Z2tiXlx4VgKhJhdfoM1tt6Fu54OI056dNHH3d0F7LVfdXExPEGPJu0zPL2vF-jru-2Xyyty_en9h8u318Q2PS-kGajUrRl5XUXP2hHaftDG9nakmgnDJiGo7aUUwhgzjaLjphvBWNqCnCg1zQV6ecpdUvyxQi5qdtmC9zpAXLNiLeuHgUvBK_riH_Qmrql-LivOu7p82UhZKXaibIo5J5jUktys00Exqo7G1MmYqsbU0Zhideb5ffJqZhj_TPxWVAF-AnJthR2kv0__P_UXTFujug</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Raslan, Furat</creator><creator>Koehler, Stefan</creator><creator>Berg, Frank</creator><creator>Rueckriegel, Stefan</creator><creator>Ernestus, Ralf-Ingo</creator><creator>Meinhardt, Matthias</creator><creator>Westermaier, Thomas</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Vertebral body replacement with PEEK-cages after anterior corpectomy in multilevel cervical spinal stenosis: a clinical and radiological evaluation</title><author>Raslan, Furat ; Koehler, Stefan ; Berg, Frank ; Rueckriegel, Stefan ; Ernestus, Ralf-Ingo ; Meinhardt, Matthias ; Westermaier, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3809a5bd2007715de578abc7cd0a14b1f440c79944bbbfd462b6debc05e9f00b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Decompression, Surgical - instrumentation</topic><topic>Diskectomy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ketones</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopaedic Surgery</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - methods</topic><topic>Spinal stenosis</topic><topic>Spinal Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raslan, Furat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koehler, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rueckriegel, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ernestus, Ralf-Ingo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meinhardt, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westermaier, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raslan, Furat</au><au>Koehler, Stefan</au><au>Berg, Frank</au><au>Rueckriegel, Stefan</au><au>Ernestus, Ralf-Ingo</au><au>Meinhardt, Matthias</au><au>Westermaier, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vertebral body replacement with PEEK-cages after anterior corpectomy in multilevel cervical spinal stenosis: a clinical and radiological evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle><stitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</stitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>611</spage><epage>618</epage><pages>611-618</pages><issn>0936-8051</issn><eissn>1434-3916</eissn><abstract>Introduction
A growing number of industrially manufactured implants have been developed in the last years for vertebral replacement in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)-cages are used in many centers, but outcome reports are scarce. This study assesses the clinical and radiological outcome after one- or two-level ACCF by the use of a PEEK-cage augmented by a plate–screw osteosynthesis.
Methods
A total of 21 patients received one-level (18 patients) or two-level (3 patients) ACCF by a PEEK-cage and plate–screw osteosynthesis for multilevel degenerative stenosis. The Visual Analogue Scale, Nurick Score, Neck Disability Index and European Myelopathy Score were used for clinical assessment. Radiological outcome—osseous fusion and loss of height—was evaluated by CT.
Results
The mean follow-up was 28 ± 12 months. In 19 patients, bony fusion was achieved after the primary operation. Graft failure that required surgical revision occurred in two patients. In these patients, osseous fusion was achieved after the second operation. Myelopathy improved significantly. The loss of height was 2.2 ± 2.3 and 5.3 ± 2.1 mm after one- and two-level ACCF, respectively.
Conclusion
Anterior corpectomy and fusion by a PEEK-cage and plate–screw osteosynthesis resulted in clinical improvement in all patients. Bony fusion was achieved in all patients in the long run. PEEK cages are allegedly less rigid than other xenografts. Similar to those, however, their use bears the risk of early cage-dislocation and subsidence. A comparison of industrial xenografts and autologous bone implants is required to challenge the different fusion techniques.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>24676649</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00402-014-1972-1</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0936-8051 |
ispartof | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2014-05, Vol.134 (5), p.611-618 |
issn | 0936-8051 1434-3916 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1517882942 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Adult Aged Biocompatible Materials Bone Plates Bone Screws Cervical Vertebrae - surgery Decompression, Surgical - instrumentation Diskectomy - methods Female Humans Ketones Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Orthopaedic Surgery Orthopedics Polyethylene Glycols Prostheses and Implants Prosthesis Design Reoperation Retrospective Studies Spinal Cord Diseases - surgery Spinal Fusion - instrumentation Spinal Fusion - methods Spinal stenosis Spinal Stenosis - surgery Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
title | Vertebral body replacement with PEEK-cages after anterior corpectomy in multilevel cervical spinal stenosis: a clinical and radiological evaluation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T02%3A29%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vertebral%20body%20replacement%20with%20PEEK-cages%20after%20anterior%20corpectomy%20in%20multilevel%20cervical%20spinal%20stenosis:%20a%20clinical%20and%20radiological%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20trauma%20surgery&rft.au=Raslan,%20Furat&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=611&rft.epage=618&rft.pages=611-618&rft.issn=0936-8051&rft.eissn=1434-3916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00402-014-1972-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2261979399%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3809a5bd2007715de578abc7cd0a14b1f440c79944bbbfd462b6debc05e9f00b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2261979399&rft_id=info:pmid/24676649&rfr_iscdi=true |