Study of the biodegradation levels of oils from the Orinoco Oil Belt (Junin area) using different biodegradation scales

• Published in: Organic geochemistry 2014, Vol.66, p.60-69
• Main Author: LOPEZ, Liliana
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Earth sciences; Earth, ocean, space; Exact sciences and technology; Hydrocarbons; Sedimentary rocks
• ISSN: 0146-6380; 1873-5290
• DOI: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2013.10.014

This work presents a study of the molecular composition of the saturated and aromatic hydrocarbon fractions of crude oils from the Orinoco Oil Belt (Junin area) in the Eastern Venezuelan Basin, with the purpose of classifying these samples following two distinct biodegradation assessment schemes: the PM scale [Peters, K.E., Moldowan, J.M., 1993. The Biomarker Guide: Interpreting Molecular Fossils in Petroleum and Ancient Sediments. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, p. 363] and the Manco scale [Larter, S., Huang, H., Adams, J., Bennett, B., Snowdon, L.R., 2012. A practical biodegradation scale for use in reservoir geochemical studies of biodegraded oils. Organic Geochemistry 45, 66-76]. Both scales agree on the presence of different levels of biodegradation for the analyzed oils, although they are based on different groups of compounds. The PM scale uses mainly compounds from the saturated hydrocarbon fractions (e.g., n-alkanes, acyclic isoprenoids, terpanes and steranes) as well as aromatic steroids. On the other hand, the Manco scale considers other compounds (e.g., alkyltoluenes, naphthalene, methylnaphthalene, phenanthrene, alkylphenanthrenes and methyldibenzothiophenes) not included in the PM biodegradation scale. Thus, the combined use of these two scales allows the determination of the level of biodegradation of both saturated and aromatic compound classes. Dibenzothiophene (DBT), which was not included for the Manco score determination, also shows variations in peak intensity when compared to C4-alkylnaphthalenes, presumably associated with the process of biological alteration. The differences in the biodegradation levels observed in the present study may be attributed to variations in parameters that control biodegradation rates laterally across the study area or the existence of varying communities of microorganisms, among other possible factors.