Loading…

Synthesis of core–shell structured zeolite-A@mesoporous silica composites for butyraldehyde adsorption

[Display omitted] •The mesoporous silica shells are constructed on two different sizes of zeolite A through a sol–gel process.•The butyraldehyde adsorption amount on the core–shell composite is about double that of pristine A.•The thickness of the mesoporous silica shells change with the particle si...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of colloid and interface science 2014-08, Vol.428 (428), p.251-256
Main Authors: Yu, Haijun, Lv, Yingying, Ma, Kuoyan, Wang, Changguo, Xue, Zhaoteng, Zhao, Yujuan, Deng, Yonghui, Dai, Ya, Zhao, Dongyuan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[Display omitted] •The mesoporous silica shells are constructed on two different sizes of zeolite A through a sol–gel process.•The butyraldehyde adsorption amount on the core–shell composite is about double that of pristine A.•The thickness of the mesoporous silica shells change with the particle size of zeolite A. A simple sol–gel process is followed to construct a thin layer of mesoporous silica shell core–shell structure on micrometer sized and nanometer sized zeolite A (micro-zeolite A@SiO2 and nano-zeolite A@SiO2 respectively). Further thickness of the silica shells has been tuned from 20 to 50nm while the zeolite A particle size changes from nanometer to micrometer. Pores of the silica shells arranged orderly on the crystal-faces of zeolite-A cores. Typically, adsorption amount of the butyraldehyde towards these core–shell composite materials is investigated well and is verified to be almost double than that of the pristine zeolite A. Interestingly the nano-zeolite A core containing core–shell composite absorbs maximum butyraldehyde (314mg/g) compared to the micro-zeolite A (266mg/g), even if the mesoporous shell thickness of the nano-zeolite A@SiO2 composites is less (20nm) than that of micro-zeolite A@SiO2 (50nm). Both of these values are significantly larger than the pristine zeolite A (nano-zeolite A; 151mg/g and micro-zeolite A; 146mg/g).
ISSN:0021-9797
1095-7103
DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2014.04.060