Sports injury prevention in your pocket?! Prevention apps assessed against the available scientific evidence: a review

Background High costs and personal burden follow sports and physical activity-related injuries (SPRI). The last decades’ knowledge on how to prevent SPRIs has grown. Past years’ eHealth is emerging and mobile applications (apps) helping to prevent SPRIs are appearing. Aim To review the content of iP...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of sports medicine 2014-06, Vol.48 (11), p.878-882
Main Authors: van Mechelen, Daan M, van Mechelen, Willem, Verhagen, Evert A L M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Athletic Injuries - prevention & control
Athletic Injuries - rehabilitation
Cell Phone
Digital audio players
Evidence-Based Medicine
Female
Humans
Knowledge
Male
Mobile Applications
Physical fitness
Prevention
Ratings & rankings
Search engines
Smartphones
Software
Sports injuries
Sports medicine
Surgical Tape
Telemedicine - methods
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background High costs and personal burden follow sports and physical activity-related injuries (SPRI). The last decades’ knowledge on how to prevent SPRIs has grown. Past years’ eHealth is emerging and mobile applications (apps) helping to prevent SPRIs are appearing. Aim To review the content of iPhone and iPad apps containing a claim to prevent sports and physical activity-related injuries and to appraise this claim against best available scientific evidence. Methods The US iTunes App Store was searched using the keywords ‘injury’, ‘prevention’ and ‘rehabilitation’. Apps within the categories ‘health & fitness’, ‘sports’ and ‘medical’ containing a preventive claim in the app name, description or screenshots were included. Claims were extracted and a search for best available evidence was performed. Results Eighteen apps met our inclusion criteria. Four of these apps contained claims for which evidence was available: three apps covered ankle sprains and provided information on taping or neuromuscular training. Of these three apps, one app also provided information on prevention of dental injury with mouth guards. One app provided a routine to prevent anterior cruciate ligament injury. The main focus of the five apps was running injury prevention; for their content evidence of absence of efficacy was found. For nine apps no evidence supporting their content was found. Conclusions f 18 apps included, only four contained claims that could be supported by available literature and five apps contained false claims. This lack of scientifically sound apps provides an opportunity for caretakers to develop apps with evidence-based claims to prevent SPRIs.
ISSN:0306-3674
1473-0480
DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2012-092136