Loading…
Relational processing following stroke
► Stroke patients and matched controls completed four relational processing tasks. ► Each task included items at two or three levels of relational complexity. ► Ternary-relational items were most sensitive to stroke status. ► The frontal stroke group was more severely impaired than non-frontal strok...
Saved in:
Published in: | Brain and cognition 2013-02, Vol.81 (1), p.44-51 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ► Stroke patients and matched controls completed four relational processing tasks. ► Each task included items at two or three levels of relational complexity. ► Ternary-relational items were most sensitive to stroke status. ► The frontal stroke group was more severely impaired than non-frontal stroke group. ► Inter-correlations among tasks suggest relational processing is domain-general.
The research examined relational processing following stroke. Stroke patients (14 with frontal, 30 with non-frontal lesions) and 41 matched controls completed four relational processing tasks: sentence comprehension, Latin square matrix completion, modified Dimensional Change Card Sorting, and n-back. Each task included items at two or three levels of relational complexity. Relational processing was impaired in the stroke groups. This was due mainly to items at the intermediate ternary-relational level of complexity. Less complex binary-relational items and more complex quaternary-relational items (the latter are difficult for adults generally) were less sensitive to stroke status. Impairment was greater in frontal than non-frontal stroke patients. Positive inter-correlations among measures supported the domain-general nature of relational processing. Implications for assessment and intervention are discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0278-2626 1090-2147 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.09.003 |