Loading…

Examining the influence of climate, supervisor guidance, and behavioral integrity on work-family conflict: A demands and resources approach

In this study, we assess a multilevel approach to work interference with family (WIF) by examining the influence of unit-level work–family climate, as well as the importance of supervisors’ spoken guidance and their behavioral integrity in helping employees process social information about work–fami...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of organizational behavior 2014-05, Vol.35 (4), p.447-463
Main Authors: Paustian-Underdahl, Samantha C., Halbesleben, Jonathon R. B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this study, we assess a multilevel approach to work interference with family (WIF) by examining the influence of unit-level work–family climate, as well as the importance of supervisors’ spoken guidance and their behavioral integrity in helping employees process social information about work–family issues. We propose that there are two important ways in which supervisors may influence their subordinates’ WIF—through their spoken guidance regarding managing work–family conflict and through their behavioral integrity—employee perceptions of the degree to which supervisors’ spoken work–family guidance aligns with their behaviors to help employees manage work and family on the job. Results from a sample of 628 employees of a health system, using path analytic tests of moderated mediation, provide support for the mediated effect of family-supportive climate on employee work–family conflict (through supervisory work–family guidance) and for a second-stage moderation in which the effect of guidance on WIF is stronger (weaker) when employees perceive high (low) levels of supervisor work–family behavioral integrity. We discuss the implications of these findings for the study of family-supportive work environments and work–family conflict. Limitations of this study and directions for future research are also presented.
ISSN:0894-3796
1099-1379
DOI:10.1002/job.1883