Lymphatic fluid for the detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in cows by PCR, compared to fecal sampling and detection of antibodies in blood and milk

• Published in: Veterinary microbiology 2014-08, Vol.172 (1-2), p.301-308
• Main Authors: Khol, Johannes L., Pinedo, Pablo J., Buergelt, Claus D., Neumann, Laura M., Rae, D. Owen
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Antibodies, Bacterial - analysis; Antibodies, Bacterial - blood; Cattle; Cattle Diseases - diagnosis; Cattle Diseases - immunology; Cattle Diseases - microbiology; Feces - microbiology; Female; Johne's disease; Lymph - microbiology; Lymphatic fluid; Milk - microbiology; Mycobacterium avium; Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis; Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis - immunology; Paratuberculosis - diagnosis; Paratuberculosis - immunology; Paratuberculosis - microbiology; Polymerase chain reaction; Udder
• ISSN: 0378-1135; 1873-2542
• DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.05.022

•Lymphatic fluid from 122 animals was collected and tested for MAP by nested PCR.•MAP was detected in 27.1% of the lymph samples; agreement with other tests was poor.•Resampling revealed 20.0%, 5.5% and 27.8% lymph-positive cows, respectively.•Lymph-positive cows had a 7.2 times greater likelihood of being culled.•Lymphatic fluid might be promising for the detection of early MAP-infection in cows. Johne's disease (JD), caused by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP), can cause considerable economic losses in affected herds. Early diagnosis of JD is hampered by the chronic nature of the disease with a slow subclincal progression. The aim of the present study was to challenge the hypothesis that lymphatic fluid is of diagnostic value in the early stages of the disease. Lymphatic fluid from 122 animals was collected and tested for MAP by nested PCR for IS900 and compared to the results of testing for MAP in feces (culture), blood and milk (ELISA) in 110 of these samples. MAP was detected by PCR in 27.1% of the lymph samples. Agreement between the tests was poor: 6.9% of the lymph positive cows were also positive in all other tests applied, and 69.0% had negative results in fecal culture, blood and milk ELISA. Resampling of 25 cows after 8 to 12 and 16 to 20 months revealed 20.0% lymph positive animals at the first, 5.5% at the second and 27.8% at the third sampling, respectively. Only one cow showed positive lymph-PCR results at more than one sampling date. Lymph-positive cows had a 7.2 times greater likelihood of being culled within 8 to 12 months after sampling, compared to negative cows, mainly due to other health issues than JD. It can be concluded, that lymphatic fluid might be promising for the detection of early MAP-infection in cows, but further studies to elucidate the potential of this diagnostic approach are needed.