How Preferences Change Institutions: The 1978 Energy Act

In this article, we advance a generic theory of institutional change and illustrate it through a study of the Gas Deregulation Act of 1977–78. The passage of the Act provides an informative case study about institutional change as an innovative postcloture filibuster was implemented, and then defeat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of politics 2014-04, Vol.76 (2), p.430-445
Main Authors: Jeong, Gyung-Ho, Lowry, William R., Miller, Gary J., Sened, Itai
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Almanacs
Coalitions
Decision-making
Deregulation
Economic conditions
Economic infrastructure
Economic reform
Energy
Energy policy
Filibuster
Filibusters
Institutionalism
Legislators
Majorities
Majority Rule
Negotiation
Negotiations
Political debate
Political economy
Political regulation
Preferences
Regulation
Senators
United States Senate
Voting
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this article, we advance a generic theory of institutional change and illustrate it through a study of the Gas Deregulation Act of 1977–78. The passage of the Act provides an informative case study about institutional change as an innovative postcloture filibuster was implemented, and then defeated, in the course of the debate. Contrary to Shepsle’s argument that institutions determine outcomes, we argue that the legislative majority shaped the institution to get the policy outcome it wanted. We find evidence that negotiations among competing coalitions constrained outcomes to be inside the uncovered set. When the filibuster-related rules threatened to lead to an outcome outside of the uncovered set, the rules were changed to avoid this outcome. Our analysis calls into question both the view of majority rule as generically leading to chaos and the view that institutions are the essential tool to overcome such instability.
ISSN:0022-3816
1468-2508
DOI:10.1017/S0022381613001370