Loading…
Mitigating e-mail requests in teenagers’ first and second language academic cyber-consultation
The study analyses teenagers’ e-mail requests during academic cyber-consultation, exploring how the performance of request modifiers is influenced by participants’ perceptions of the degree of imposition of the speech act and social distance with the recipient. A total of 295 e-mail requests, 145 pr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Multilingua 2013-11, Vol.32 (6), p.779-799 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The study analyses teenagers’ e-mail requests during academic cyber-consultation, exploring
how the performance of request modifiers is influenced by participants’ perceptions of the degree
of imposition of the speech act and social distance with the recipient. A total of 295 e-mail requests,
145 produced by British English speakers (BES) and 150 performed by International English speakers
(IES), were randomly selected from all the e-mail requests that International Baccalaureate students
sent to their learning mentor between September and December 2011. They were analysed with
regard to the use of internal and external request mitigators and participants’ judgments of the degree
of request imposition and social distance with the e-mail recipient. Results of the study show that
participants do not frequently rely on mitigators, but whenever they perceive the need to mitigate
the request, pragmatic variation is observed between BES and IES. Thus, when the request is
perceived as demanding, BES activate their pragmalinguistic knowledge and use a wider range
of internal modifiers (both lexical and syntactic). In contrast, IES seem to lack pragmalinguistic
knowledge to soften the request. Finally, although teenagers do not perceive their relationship
with their learning mentor as one of +social distance, BES and IES show variation in their choice
of form of address. Findings from the study suggest the need to incorporate training on e-mail
politeness in future pragmatics-based pedagogical interventions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-8507 1613-3684 |
DOI: | 10.1515/multi-2013-0037 |